Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/experiments/verification-pass/

experiment / experiment

# Verification pass

Repeated, adversarial verification found real defects and improved the corpus, while preserving the difference between tested evidence and product qualification.

Status: **observed**Lifecycle: **experiment**

## Full-catalog stress pass

The full-catalog pass ran 2,787 requests across boundary, convention, and self-check angles. Five genuine computational defects were independently verified and corrected; one apparent IEEE-754 defect was retracted after deeper reading.

## Interpretation

The result establishes a much stronger source-bound verification record. It still does not collapse catalog review, application binding, input validation, interaction quality, live-data provenance, and production qualification into one status.

## Next gate

Apply binding errata, enforce the boundary-hazard checks, expose source and unit conventions, then qualify the executable surface and its receipts before describing an instrument as shipped.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `STRESS_TEST_RECEIPT.json`

- `STRESS_TEST_CORRECTIONS_APPLIED.json`

- `BOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json`

- `VERIFIED_LEDGER.json`

## Related routes

- [index](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/>)

- [agents/stan](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/agents/stan/>)

- [products/guth-notebook](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/products/guth-notebook/>)

- [products/pointguard](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/products/pointguard/>)