Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/campaign-packets/qualification/ field guide / candidate # Campaign packets โ€” qualification The distinct qualification record for Campaign packets. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: field-guide:campaign-packets **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: docs_urls **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Rebecca **Owner role**: Not separately recorded **Owner status**: Not separately recorded **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Field guides โ€” documentation]() โ€” Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Qualification status **Result**: NOT RUN **Disposition**: HELD **Reviewer**: Not recorded **Receipt**: Not recorded This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect. ### Lane-specific instrument aids No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane. ## Outcome definitions **Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect. **Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason. **Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer. **Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent. The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only. ## Proposed deterministic acceptance tests Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded. - The overview page explains the packet's purpose, owner, lifecycle, prerequisites, canonical record, and held external effects. - Every listed documentation route has distinct content: overview, procedural steps, form guidance, worked example, qualification criteria, or a specific related job. - The guide links to each supplied related job and does not introduce unlisted jobs as source-backed facts. - A packet can be created with implementable fields for intent, planning, drafts, assets, approvals, workback, and post-performance records. - A reviewer can trace every draft, asset reference, approval decision, deadline, and post-performance observation to a record ID or source-labelled note. - Approval states are visibly limited to Needs review, Approved, and Held, with a preserved receipt reference. - The guide never states that campaign content was sent, published, uploaded, delivered, indexed for customers, or connected to a provider. - The guide labels unsupported claims, missing evidence, held effects, and incomplete qualification states clearly. - Keyboard navigation, visible focus, labelled fields, error summaries, non-color status labels, and readable date formats are required for all proposed forms. - A failed validation preserves entered values, identifies the offending field, and does not create a falsely complete packet. - Lifecycle labels remain honest: this guide and its pages are proposed; app surfaces retain their observed prototype or indexed states. - Search and related-job pages provide useful distinct summaries and links rather than duplicate keyword pages. ## Negative and held-state tests - A draft may be mistaken for approved or published content if lifecycle and approval state are not shown together. - Asset references may be mistaken for uploaded or rights-cleared assets; custody, permission, and upload state must remain explicit. - A named owner agent does not prove provider access, execution authority, or external delivery capability. - Campaign metrics may be fabricated if post-performance records accept unlabelled or unavailable evidence. - Deadline changes can erase accountability unless revisions and reasons are preserved. - Recipient, channel, accessibility, or claim-review errors can survive if approval routing is treated as a single undifferentiated gate. - Private work, customer data, and public documentation can be mixed unless visibility and source labels are preserved. - Long or malformed content can break forms; validation and deterministic failure states are required. - Duplicate route pages can become doorway content if each page does not answer a distinct question. ## Qualification claim boundary ### Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence - A proposed Guth field guide can describe a campaign-packet workflow from social planning through post-performance records. - The supplied source record names Rebecca as owner agent and lists Social planning, Draft preparation, Asset coordination, Approval routing, and Post-performance records as related jobs. - Observed Notebook surfaces include field guides, projects, notes, files, to-dos, agenda, messages, approvals, paper, search, and agent logs with the stated prototype or indexed labels. - The workflow can require provenance, revisions, source-labelled records, explicit approval states, deadlines, and held external effects. ### Still held - Do not claim that this guide is deployed, published, indexed for customers, or connected to a production database. - Do not claim that Rebecca or any provider can send messages, publish campaigns, upload assets, access customers, or write to external calendars. - Do not claim that campaign performance metrics, delivery results, audience data, rights clearance, or approvals exist unless supplied as records. - Do not claim qualification, completion, successful routing, or external execution from a proposed form or local receipt. - Do not claim that any app route is a connected production feature; observed routes are local prototypes or indexes and external effects remain held. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `source_record:field-guide:campaign-packets` - `agents/index.html#rebecca` - `Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections` - `Observed native contract: deadlines` - `Observed native contract: records` - `Observed native contract: pointguard`