Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/examples/

field guide / candidate

# Grant dossiers — examples

The distinct examples record for Grant dossiers. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: field-guide:grant-dossiers

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: plan

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Tilly

**Owner role**: Not separately recorded

**Owner status**: Not separately recorded

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Field guides — documentation](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/>) — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Hypothetical scenarios

A reviewer opens the Grant dossiers guide for bounded local rehearsals. Every fixture uses invented placeholders, performs no provider or external action, and remains held until source evidence and human review are recorded.

### 1. Guided inquiry fixture

A reviewer records a bounded question, links only supplied source references, and marks every unanswered point Needs review.

**Fixture ID**: grant-dossiers-example-001

**Evidence**: Hypothetical source placeholders only

**Decision**: HELD · human review required

**External effects**: None

### 2. Source comparison fixture

A reviewer compares two hypothetical source locators, preserves disagreement, and holds any conclusion until provenance is supplied.

**Fixture ID**: grant-dossiers-example-002

**Evidence**: Hypothetical source placeholders only

**Decision**: HELD · human review required

**External effects**: None

### 3. Uncertainty and pathway fixture

A reviewer constructs a local procedure or study pathway with checkpoints while labelling uncertainty and leaving external effects Held.

**Fixture ID**: grant-dossiers-example-003

**Evidence**: Hypothetical source placeholders only

**Decision**: HELD · human review required

**External effects**: None

### 4. Potentially allowed claim fixture

A hypothetical claim may advance only when its exact evidence locator, scope, reviewer, and decision rationale are recorded; this fixture asserts no fact.

**Fixture ID**: grant-dossiers-example-004

**Evidence**: Hypothetical source placeholders only

**Decision**: HELD · human review required

**External effects**: None

### 5. Held claim fixture

A hypothetical unsupported claim remains Held with missing evidence and human-review rationale visible; it is not published or indexed.

**Fixture ID**: grant-dossiers-example-005

**Evidence**: Hypothetical source placeholders only

**Decision**: HELD · human review required

**External effects**: None

## Filled example fields

### Dossier identity fixture

Define the dossier without asserting eligibility or submission status.

**dossier title**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

**grant or opportunity name as supplied**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

**source record ID**: fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)

**owner agent**: Named human or Agent owner required

**related job**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

**working lifecycle**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

### Source and provenance fixture

Preserve traceable support for every material statement.

**source URL or locator**: fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)

**source excerpt or note**: fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)

**source SHA-256 if available**: fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)

**origin**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

**capture date**: Not supplied in this hypothetical fixture

**revision ID**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

### Requirements and constraints fixture

Convert only observed source material into reviewable requirements.

**requirement statement**: Held — pending human review

**requirement category**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

**mandatory or optional**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

**evidence needed**: fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)

**open question**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

**assumption flag**: Example value to be supplied and reviewed

## Review questions

- A dossier record identifies Tilly as owner and links every requirement to a source-labelled note, file reference, or an explicit missing-evidence state.

- Every evidence item preserves its source locator and, when available, provenance, revision, and source SHA-256.

- A workback cannot be marked review-ready when the deadline time zone is missing or unresolved conflicts remain.

- Each designated instrument uses an exact allowed slug and stores inputs, outputs, limitations, and reviewer state.

- The instrument record explicitly states that calculators support educational or planning estimates and do not qualify an application or prove eligibility.

- Draft sections distinguish evidence-backed wording, assumptions, proposed wording, and held claims.

- Approval receipts show who reviewed each consequential decision and whether it is Needs review, Approved, or Held.

- File references expose type and size and do not claim upload, protected storage, provider connection, publication, or external submission.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `source_record:field-guide:grant-dossiers`

- `agents/index.html#tilly`

- `Observed native contract: Notebook collections and lifecycle`

- `Observed native contract: Notebook deadlines and workback payload`

- `Observed native contract: provenance, canonical IDs, source locators, SHA-256, revisions, and attachments`

- `Observed native contract: PointGuard context surface and specialist-app record ownership`

- `Observed app routes supplied for Guth Hub, PointGuard, Notebook, Business, and related review surfaces`

- `Allowed verified-instrument directory supplied; no instrument selected because this dossier procedure has no demonstrated calculation requirement`

- `field-guide:grant-dossiers`

- `/app/notebook/field-guides/`

- `/app/notebook/notes/`

- `/app/notebook/files/`

- `/app/notebook/approvals/`

- `/app/notebook/paper/`

- `/app/notebook/to-dos/`

- `/app/notebook/agenda/`

- `/app/notebook/agent-logs/`

- `date-duration-calculator`

- `countdown-days-until-timer`
