Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/ field guide / candidate # Grant dossiers A proposal-only, source-bound procedure for Tilly to assemble, review, reconcile, and hold grant dossier records using local Notebook surfaces, explicit evidence, deadlines, and human approval. It does not establish grant eligibility, provider access, submission, publication, or production state. Status: **candidate**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: field-guide:grant-dossiers **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: catalog overview **Lane lifecycle**: candidate **Owner**: Tilly **Owner role**: Not separately recorded **Owner status**: Not separately recorded **Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Field guides — documentation]() — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Purpose and audience A proposal-only, source-bound procedure for Tilly to assemble, review, reconcile, and hold grant dossier records using local Notebook surfaces, explicit evidence, deadlines, and human approval. It does not establish grant eligibility, provider access, submission, publication, or production state. - Tilly - grant research and drafting agents - independent reviewers - evidence reviewers - human approvers ## Required or proposed record references The list defines expected record classes. It does not assert that any instance exists. - source-labelled grant opportunity record - grant dossier project record - evidence records with source locator and SHA-256 where available - draft narrative or response records - deadline and workback to-do records - review and reconciliation notes - approval receipt record ## Route contract The links below are this site's admitted canonical public records. Source-lane route suggestions are proposals only and are not represented as live or canonical until separately admitted. [01**overview**/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/]()[02**prerequisites**/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/prerequisites/]()[03**steps**/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/steps/]()[04**tools**/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/tools/]()[05**forms**/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/forms/]()[06**examples**/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/examples/]()[07**related jobs**/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/related-jobs/]()[08**qualification**/docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/qualification/]() ### Held source-proposed extensions - /docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/overview/ - /docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/intake/ - /docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/evidence-reconciliation/ - /docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/independent-review/ - /docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/instrument-qualification/ - /docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/draft-review/ - /docs/field-guides/grant-dossiers/website-claim-review/ These extension paths are not generated by this record and must not be treated as resolving routes. ## Public claim boundary Allowed items below are source-lane proposals, not verified current-state claims. ### Candidate claims allowed after source review - A proposed field guide exists for preparing source-bound grant dossiers. - The guide uses the observed local Notebook, Approvals, Agenda, Files, Projects, Search, Agent Logs, and PointGuard surfaces as bounded prototype or indexed interfaces. - The supplied source record names Tilly as owner and lists the related jobs: Independent review, Instrument qualification, Evidence reconciliation, Grant research and drafts, and Website claim review. - The workflow requires provenance, evidence links, revisions, explicit deadlines, review records, and human-held external effects. ### Claims held - Any claim that a grant opportunity is live, available, eligible, suitable, or qualified. - Any claim that Tilly or another party has submitted, received, or will receive funding. - Any provider connection, credential use, grant-portal write, database authority, customer indexing, publication, or production effect. - Any claim that an external deadline, timezone, submission method, or requirement exists unless supplied by a verified source record. - Any claim that a draft is legally, financially, technically, or institutionally complete without human review. - Any claim that a named native surface proves a connected web feature. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `source_record:field-guide:grant-dossiers` - `agents/index.html#tilly` - `Observed native contract: Notebook collections and lifecycle` - `Observed native contract: Notebook deadlines and workback payload` - `Observed native contract: provenance, canonical IDs, source locators, SHA-256, revisions, and attachments` - `Observed native contract: PointGuard context surface and specialist-app record ownership` - `Observed app routes supplied for Guth Hub, PointGuard, Notebook, Business, and related review surfaces` - `Allowed verified-instrument directory supplied; no instrument selected because this dossier procedure has no demonstrated calculation requirement` - `field-guide:grant-dossiers` - `/app/notebook/field-guides/` - `/app/notebook/notes/` - `/app/notebook/files/` - `/app/notebook/approvals/` - `/app/notebook/paper/` - `/app/notebook/to-dos/` - `/app/notebook/agenda/` - `/app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `date-duration-calculator` - `countdown-days-until-timer` - `source record: field-guide:grant-dossiers` - `Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections` - `Observed native contract: deadlines` - `Observed native contract: records` - `Observed native contract: pointguard`