Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/outreach-rules/qualification/ field guide / candidate # Outreach rules โ€” qualification The distinct qualification record for Outreach rules. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: field-guide:outreach-rules **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: docs_urls **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Wick **Owner role**: Not separately recorded **Owner status**: Not separately recorded **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Field guides โ€” documentation]() โ€” Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Qualification status **Result**: NOT RUN **Disposition**: HELD **Reviewer**: Not recorded **Receipt**: Not recorded This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect. ### Lane-specific instrument aids No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane. ## Outcome definitions **Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect. **Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason. **Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer. **Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent. The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only. ## Proposed deterministic acceptance tests Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded. - Every documentation route has a distinct purpose and contains content not duplicated from the overview. - The overview identifies the five related jobs: World-post research, Outreach dossiers, Message drafts, Response triage, and Campaign chronology. - Each workflow record displays a canonical ID or linked source record, lifecycle, provenance, and revision state where applicable. - A message draft can be prepared and reviewed without exposing a send control that implies external delivery. - Approval states are visibly limited to Needs review, Approved, and Held, with a receipt or decision note. - A response can be triaged into a separate record and linked back to the dossier and chronology without overwriting source evidence. - A follow-up to-do requires owner, priority, due date or explicit undated state, and held reason when blocked. - Private, public, and held records are visibly partitioned in search and documentation links. - Keyboard navigation, visible focus, labelled form controls, readable error messages, and non-color-only status indicators are present on every proposed form. - Invalid or incomplete records fail safely with a clear message and remain in Needs review or Held state. - Agent Logs expose Wick's current work and authority boundary without claiming production execution. - No page claims provider connection, credentials, database authority, customer indexing, publication, deployment, or successful external send. ## Negative and held-state tests - Treating a named related job or native surface as proof of a connected production workflow. - Inventing recipients, responses, dates, provider data, customer records, or campaign outcomes. - Duplicating one generic page across many URLs without distinct search value. - Allowing a draft, approval, or triage record to imply an external send or customer-visible change. - Losing provenance, source locators, revisions, or chronology ordering during edits. - Using deadlines as hidden automation instead of explicit human-review signals. - Exposing private dossiers or held records through public documentation or broad search. - Overstating qualification when evidence is incomplete or unverified. - Accessibility failures in status labels, focus order, validation, or keyboard-only use. ## Qualification claim boundary ### Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence - This is a proposed source-backed field guide for organizing outreach-related records and review steps. - The guide relates to World-post research, Outreach dossiers, Message drafts, Response triage, and Campaign chronology. - The documented app surfaces are local prototypes or indexes with the stated capabilities and boundaries. - Message preparation, review states, deadlines, provenance, and chronology can be specified as proposed record behavior. - The allowed verified-instrument directory was reviewed for this proposal and no instrument is designated. ### Still held - Any claim that outreach messages are sent or delivered. - Any claim of provider, credential, database, customer, calendar, or publication connection. - Any claim that Wick or another Agent executed external outreach. - Any claim of customer indexing, production deployment, or live campaign status. - Any claim that a response was received unless represented by a separately verified source record. - Any claim that an item is qualified, approved for external use, or legally or policy compliant without explicit human review and evidence. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `source_record:field-guide:outreach-rules` - `agents/index.html#wick` - `observed_native_contract:project_and_field_guide_collections` - `observed_native_contract:deadlines` - `observed_native_contract:records` - `observed_native_contract:pointguard` - `app_route:/app/notebook/field-guides/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/messages/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/approvals/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/to-dos/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/agent-logs/`