Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/primary-source-packets/forms/

field guide / candidate

# Primary-source packets — forms

The distinct forms record for Primary-source packets. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: field-guide:primary-source-packets

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: plan

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Socrates

**Owner role**: Not separately recorded

**Owner status**: Not separately recorded

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Field guides — documentation](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/>) — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Proposed form sections

Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth.

### Scope and ownership

Define the inquiry before collecting or comparing material.

- packet title

- inquiry question

- intended use: guided inquiry, source comparison, lesson pathway, or study record

- owner agent

- human reviewer

- audience

- visibility

- creation date

- target review date

### Source inventory

Record each source without substituting unsupported material.

- source title

- source type

- source locator

- provided artifact reference

- source SHA-256 if available

- origin

- date or period as stated by source

- language

- access notes

- inclusion rationale

- excluded material and reason

### Evidence extraction

Capture bounded excerpts and claims with traceable locators.

- source record ID

- excerpt or observation

- locator

- claim supported

- context needed

- direct quotation or paraphrase

- confidence label

- interpretive note

- unresolved ambiguity

### Source comparison

Separate agreement, disagreement, scope, and missing evidence.

- comparison question

- sources compared

- shared evidence

- material difference

- possible explanation

- unsupported inference to avoid

- additional evidence needed

- review status

### Lesson or study pathway

Translate evidence into a reviewable learning sequence without presenting interpretation as fact.

- learning objective

- ordered activity

- linked evidence records

- learner prompt

- expected response type

- uncertainty prompt

- accessibility accommodation

- completion signal

### Review and receipts

Make human review explicit and preserve the decision state.

- reviewer

- review date

- decision: Needs review, Approved, or Held

- issues found

- corrections required

- receipt reference

- next action

- next due date

### Accessible state contract

- Every field requires a visible and programmatic label.

- Required and optional fields must be stated in text.

- Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field.

- Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone.

## Supporting documentation fields

These fields come from the tools lane and remain separate from the primary operating form.

### Inquiry brief

Define the bounded question and intended audience before collecting sources.

- inquiry question

- historical or topical scope

- audience

- learning objective

- packet owner

- target completion date

- visibility

### Source inventory

Register each source with enough provenance for later inspection.

- source title

- creator or originating body

- date created

- source type

- source locator

- local file reference

- source SHA-256

- provenance note

- known gaps

- rights or access note

### Comparison frame

Make similarities, differences, corroboration, and uncertainty explicit.

- comparison criteria

- claim or passage

- source references

- agreement

- conflict

- context note

- confidence label

- unresolved question

### Lesson pathway

Turn the packet into bounded inquiry steps without presenting interpretation as settled fact.

- ordered activity

- required reading

- prompt

- evidence to inspect

- student output

- facilitator note

- accessibility accommodation

- estimated duration

### Human review and receipt

Record what was checked and what remains held.

- reviewer

- review date

- review status

- provenance checked

- source identity checked

- uncertainties retained

- corrections requested

- approval receipt

- publication status

## Required or proposed record references

No record existence is asserted by this documentation page.

- field-guide:primary-source-packets

- source note for each included source

- source-labelled file reference for each supplied artifact

- comparison record

- uncertainty and limitation record

- study or lesson pathway record

- review receipt or approval record

- todo records for unresolved work

- source packet record

- source record per item

- comparison note

- uncertainty note

- review approval

- todo or deadline record

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `source_record:field-guide:primary-source-packets`

- `agents/index.html#socrates`

- `observed_native_contract.project_and_field_guide_collections`

- `observed_native_contract.deadlines`

- `observed_native_contract.records`

- `observed_native_contract.pointguard`

- `app_route:/app/pointguard/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/field-guides/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/notes/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/files/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/projects/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/to-dos/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/approvals/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/agent-logs/`

- `/app/notebook/field-guides/`

- `/app/notebook/notes/`

- `/app/notebook/files/`

- `/app/notebook/approvals/`

- `/app/notebook/agent-logs/`