Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/security-field-guides/prerequisites/

field guide / candidate

# Security field guides — prerequisites

The distinct prerequisites record for Security field guides. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: field-guide:security-field-guides

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: plan

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Stan

**Owner role**: Not separately recorded

**Owner status**: Not separately recorded

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Field guides — documentation](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/>) — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Entry evidence and required records

Before the procedure starts, an operator must identify the source, owner, scope, and required records below. Missing evidence holds the guide.

- field-guide:security-field-guides:plan

- source record field-guide:security-field-guides

- owner agent Stan record or agent reference

- one source-labelled note containing the scope decision

- one receipt-backed approval record before any lifecycle change

- linked to-do records for unresolved prerequisites and deadlines

## Intended operators and ownership

- Stan

- Security engineering

- Architecture and implementation

- SRE and incident command

- Fleet operations

- Receipt-backed handoffs

Being listed as an intended operator does not grant execution or publication authority.

## Conditions that hold the guide before entry

- The supplied source contains ownership and related-job labels but no detailed security procedure; adding technical controls without a new source would exceed the boundary.

- A named agent or native route does not prove that a connected security web feature exists.

- Local approval is not deployment, qualification, publication, or authorization for external effects.

- Unverified source locators, missing digests, stale revisions, or incomplete provenance can make evidence non-reproducible.

- Security records may contain sensitive information; visibility, attachments, and file references must remain explicitly reviewed.

- Deadline fields can be mistaken for automation; recurrenceCandidate must not be treated as an active schedule.

- Instrument output is educational or verification support only and cannot establish production security posture.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `source_record:field-guide:security-field-guides`

- `agents/index.html#stan`

- `field-guide:security-field-guides`

- `Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections`

- `Observed native contract: deadlines`

- `Observed native contract: records`

- `Observed native contract: pointguard`