Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/world-packets/prerequisites/

field guide / candidate

# World packets — prerequisites

The distinct prerequisites record for World packets. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: field-guide:world-packets

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: plan

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Wick

**Owner role**: Not separately recorded

**Owner status**: Not separately recorded

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Field guides — documentation](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/>) — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Entry evidence and required records

Before the procedure starts, an operator must identify the source, owner, scope, and required records below. Missing evidence holds the guide.

- source-labelled world packet record

- world-post research notes

- outreach dossier

- message draft

- response-triage record

- campaign chronology

- linked file references where source material exists

- to-dos with dueAt, priority, tags, and completion state

- approval receipt for any proposed external communication

## Intended operators and ownership

- Wick

- research and outreach operators

- human reviewers

- Notebook record owners

Being listed as an intended operator does not grant execution or publication authority.

## Conditions that hold the guide before entry

- A named agent or route may be mistaken for an active connected service; label all surfaces as local prototypes or indexes where applicable.

- Research may drift into unsupported world or recipient claims; require source mapping and explicit unknowns.

- Draft approval may be mistaken for message delivery; preserve the human-held boundary.

- A response reference may be incomplete or second-hand; record observation provenance and route ambiguity to review.

- Stale, conflicting, or revised sources can invalidate a dossier; preserve revisions and reopen affected claims.

- Sensitive recipient context may be over-collected; capture only fields necessary for the stated outreach purpose and respect visibility partitions.

- Deadline automation may be inferred from recurrenceCandidate or scheduled views; use them only as local review signals.

- Distinct documentation pages must contain useful procedure content; do not create doorway or keyword-spam pages.

- Instrument selection is intentionally empty because the supplied packet workflow has no verified calculation requirement.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `source_record:field-guide:world-packets`

- `agents/index.html#wick`

- `observed_native_contract:project_and_field_guide_collections`

- `observed_native_contract:deadlines`

- `observed_native_contract:records`

- `observed_native_contract:pointguard`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/field-guides/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/notes/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/files/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/to-dos/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/messages/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/approvals/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/agent-logs/`

- `app_route:/app/notebook/projects/`

- `app_route:/app/pointguard/`