Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/field-guides/world-packets/qualification/ field guide / candidate # World packets โ€” qualification The distinct qualification record for World packets. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: field-guide:world-packets **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: docs_urls **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Wick **Owner role**: Not separately recorded **Owner status**: Not separately recorded **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Field guides โ€” documentation]() โ€” Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Qualification status **Result**: NOT RUN **Disposition**: HELD **Reviewer**: Not recorded **Receipt**: Not recorded This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect. ### Lane-specific instrument aids No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane. ## Outcome definitions **Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect. **Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason. **Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer. **Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent. The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only. ## Proposed deterministic acceptance tests Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded. - Every documentation route has a distinct purpose and contains useful content not duplicated from the overview. - The overview identifies the five related jobs and labels this guide proposed. - A packet can be created with owner, purpose, audience, visibility, and desired completion date fields. - Research records display source labels, locators, provenance, revision state, and unresolved questions. - Outreach dossiers and message drafts clearly show that external send is held. - Chronology entries support dates, owners, next actions, due dates, priorities, and approval state. - A reviewer can distinguish observed claims, interpretation, unsupported claims, and claims held. - Missing sources, missing recipients, missing deadlines, duplicate events, and failed approval are visible failure states rather than silently completed steps. - Keyboard navigation, labelled form controls, readable status text, non-color-only lifecycle indicators, and accessible error messages are required. - No route claims provider connection, credential access, database authority, customer indexing, publication, deployment, or production behavior. ## Negative and held-state tests - Source-free summaries can become unsupported public claims. - A dossier or recipient label can be mistaken for a customer record or connected outreach system. - Drafting can be mistaken for sending; final external communication must remain human-held. - Campaign chronology may contain sensitive personal or organizational context; visibility and access must be explicit. - Duplicate or conflicting events can distort chronology unless source locators and revisions are preserved. - Missing or stale deadlines can cause response work to be overlooked. - PointGuard context can aid navigation but must not replace Notebook or another specialist app as canonical record owner. - Related tools and routes are named native surfaces or verified directory entries, not proof of connected web functionality. ## Qualification claim boundary ### Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence - This is a proposed source-labelled workflow for organizing world-packet research and outreach preparation. - The guide can document research, dossiers, drafts, triage, chronology, deadlines, review states, and held actions. - The observed contract supports provenance, revisions, lifecycle, links, attachments, to-dos, approvals, and scheduled/deadline views at the native-surface level. - The related jobs are World-post research, Outreach dossiers, Message drafts, Response triage, and Campaign chronology. ### Still held - Deployment or production availability - Provider, credential, database, or customer connection - External message delivery or campaign execution - Customer indexing or public publication - Qualification as factually complete, approved, or ready to send without reviewer evidence - Any claim that a named app route is a connected web feature ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `source_record:field-guide:world-packets` - `agents/index.html#wick` - `field-guide:world-packets` - `Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections` - `Observed native contract: deadlines` - `Observed native contract: records` - `Observed native contract: pointguard` - `App route: /app/notebook/field-guides/` - `App route: /app/notebook/notes/` - `App route: /app/notebook/files/` - `App route: /app/notebook/messages/` - `App route: /app/notebook/approvals/` - `App route: /app/notebook/projects/` - `App route: /app/notebook/to-dos/` - `App route: /app/notebook/search/` - `App route: /app/pointguard/`