Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/wave-energy-flux-estimator/

instrument / verified-clean

# Wave Energy Flux Estimator

The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.

Status: **VERIFIED_CLEAN**Lifecycle: **verified-clean**

## Inspectable records

[01**Overview**Purpose and lifecycle](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/wave-energy-flux-estimator/>)[02**Mechanism**Method and assumptions](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/wave-energy-flux-estimator/mechanism/>)[03**Implementation**Binding and validation](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/wave-energy-flux-estimator/implementation/>)[04**Qualification**Evidence and errata](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/wave-energy-flux-estimator/qualification/>)

## Ledger state

The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.

**Area**: Earth & Space (astronomy, orbital mechanics, meteorology, geology, geodesy, oceanography)

**Tranche**: tranche-5

**Evidence ID**: t5-143

**Ledger rows**: 1

No ledger note is attached.

## Review findings

The arithmetic is correct under SI units with rho = 1025 kg/m^3, g = 9.81 m/s^2, significant wave height Hs, and energy period Te. Resolve the period definition and replace or revise the sinusoidal honest label before release.

### Formula and scope findings

- The formula is standard for significant wave height Hs combined with energy period Te (or an equivalent spectral period), but the specification only says generic wave period; that period definition is ambiguous.

- The honest label says sinusoidal wave approximation, but the 1/(64π) coefficient is the standard deep-water irregular-wave result using significant wave height. For a regular sinusoidal wave using crest-to-trough height H, the corresponding coefficient is 1/(32π).

- The deep-water applicability constraint is not specified. A depth input or an explicit requirement such as depth being at least approximately half the wavelength is needed to verify the approximation.

### Unit assumptions

- Use seawater density rho = 1025 kg/m^3 unless another value is explicitly selected.

- Use gravitational acceleration g = 9.81 m/s^2.

- Significant wave height Hs must be in metres.

- Wave period Te must be in seconds; minutes must be converted by multiplying by 60.

- The formula produces power in watts per metre of crest; divide by 1000 to report kW/m.

- The deep-water assumption requires sufficiently large depth relative to wavelength, commonly depth greater than about half the wavelength.

## Boundary hardening

**BREAK_CLAIMED** · SELF_FLAGGED

The plain-arithmetic implementation can overflow to Infinity for extreme finite inputs, and the specification provides no alternate formula or depth input for the shallow/intermediate-water branch even though the advertised formula is explicitly limited to deep water.

## Errata and corrections

No applied erratum is attached to this unique-name record.

## Inspectable example

4 review vectors are recorded. One source-bound sample is shown below.

````
{
  "inputs": {
    "significant_wave_height_m": 2,
    "energy_period_s": 8,
    "seawater_density_kg_m3": 1025,
    "gravity_m_s2": 9.81
  },
  "expected_outputs": {
    "power_kW_per_m": 15.6994
  },
  "working": "g^2 = 9.81^2 = 96.2361. rho*g^2 = 1025*96.2361 = 98642.0025. 64*pi = 201.06193. Coefficient = 98642.0025/201.06193 = 490.60507 W/m per (m^2*s). Hs^2*Te = 2.0^2*8.0 = 4*8 = 32. P = 490.60507*32 = 15699.3623 W/m. Convert: 15699.3623/1000 = 15.6994 kW/m."
}
````

## Related workflows

No source-defined multi-instrument workflow membership is recorded.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `VERIFIED_LEDGER.json · VERIFIED_CLEAN`

- `evidence-tranche5/tranche5-results.json`

- `BOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json`