Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/rebecca-asset-coordination/qualification/ job / candidate # Asset coordination — qualification The distinct qualification record for Asset coordination. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: job:rebecca:asset-coordination **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: qualification **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Rebecca **Owner role**: Social media operating agent **Owner status**: PROPOSED **Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs — builder overview]() — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Qualification status **Result**: NOT RUN **Disposition**: HELD **Reviewer**: Not recorded **Receipt**: Not recorded This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect. ### Lane-specific instrument aids [wcag-contrast-ratio-checkeroptional · Check declared foreground/background combinations and store the result as accessibility evidence; do not infer accessibility of an entire post or interface from one ratio.]() ## Outcome definitions **Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect. **Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason. **Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer. **Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent. The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only. ## Proposed deterministic acceptance tests Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded. - Positive: a complete draft with source locator, SHA-256, revision, explicit channel label, chronology, privacy evidence, accessibility fields, and named human approval is represented as locally Approved for that exact revision and scope, while publication remains Held. - Positive: a draft with an explicit timezone and ordered workback displays deterministic deadlines and preserves each revision. - Negative: missing source locator, source hash, provenance, or canonical ID prevents qualification and produces Held with a missing-source failure. - Negative: an unapproved account label, absent approver, or approval for a different revision prevents Approved state. - Negative: any request to self-authorize publication, connect an account, trigger paid promotion, or make a direct-message commitment produces Held and no external action. - Negative: customer proof marked invented, unsupported, or absent when required prevents approval; the system must not create testimonial or performance evidence. - Negative: personal data without a recorded consent or rights reference, or with unresolved sensitive-data exposure, prevents approval and requires redaction or documented review. - Negative: missing alt text for an informative image, missing caption or transcript for required audio/video content, non-descriptive link text, or unresolved contrast evidence produces an accessibility failure. - Negative: contradictory timestamps, missing timezone, approval before draft creation, or a planned publish time earlier than approval produces a chronology failure. - Negative: an expired, superseded, or held source revision cannot satisfy a current draft's evidence requirement. - Negative: duplicate canonical IDs or a source-hash mismatch on revision update creates a provenance failure and preserves the prior record. - Negative: final-send or publication controls are unavailable or held on the named prototype/index routes; the record must state that external effect is not verified. - Positive: reopening an Approved draft after text, asset, channel, or scope change returns it to Needs review and creates a new revision. - Positive: a failed check shows a human-readable reason, failure code, owner for resolution, next review time, and linked recovery record. - Accessibility: all blocking errors are text-labelled, keyboard reachable, associated with their fields, and not communicated by color alone; status uses text such as Needs review, Approved, and Held. - Privacy: private notes, source labels, customer details, and protected asset references are excluded from public-facing draft text unless explicitly cleared by the recorded human review. - Authority: the qualification result identifies Rebecca as PROPOSED and never treats the named agent, native surface, or app route as proof of connected authority or deployment. - Source: every externally meaningful claim in the draft is traceable to a supplied source record, approved campaign packet, or explicitly entered source reference; unsupported claims are Held. - Chronology: the displayed workback orders all required steps consistently across Today, To-dos, and Agenda records without implying provider calendar writes. ## Negative and held-state tests - Confusing a proposed social operating agent with an authorized or connected production account. - Treating prototype or indexed routes as evidence of publication, provider connection, database authority, customer indexing, or deployment. - Publishing unsupported customer proof, metrics, testimonials, or campaign outcomes. - Accidentally exposing personal data, private notes, source locators, credentials, or protected asset paths in public copy. - Approving one revision while sending or publishing another. - Ambiguous timezone or stale deadlines causing premature or missed communication. - Using accessibility labels or contrast checks as a substitute for complete content accessibility review. - Doorway documentation or duplicate route content that fragments authority instead of documenting distinct useful procedures. - Hidden automation or external writes through agenda, messages, approvals, files, or capture surfaces. - Failure states that silently discard drafts, receipts, provenance, or human decisions. ## Qualification claim boundary ### Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence - This is a proposal for qualifying Rebecca's asset-coordination job. - The supplied source record describes Rebecca as a proposed social media operating agent with draft, review, approval, and publication pipeline responsibilities. - The package can define local draft, review, approval, accessibility, privacy, chronology, and failure records. - Named Guth app routes and native contracts describe prototype or indexed surfaces and their stated bounded capabilities. - The allowed WCAG Contrast Ratio Checker instrument may be designated for a local contrast check, subject to its verified-clean directory entry. ### Still held - Rebecca is deployed, active, authorized, or connected to any account. - Any provider, credential, database, customer index, business page, publication channel, or production system is connected. - Any post was published, sent, scheduled externally, promoted, or received by a customer. - Any approval is legally, operationally, or externally effective. - Any customer proof, testimonial, metric, campaign result, or social performance claim is true without source evidence. - Any route is a connected web feature merely because a native surface or route is named. - Any documentation URL represents a live production contract. - Any file was uploaded, copied to protected storage, or made publicly available. - Any instrument result has been executed or persisted in production. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `agents/index.html#rebecca` - `source_record:job:rebecca:asset-coordination` - `job:rebecca:asset-coordination` - `Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections` - `Observed native contract: deadlines` - `Observed native contract: records` - `Observed native contract: pointguard` - `/app/notebook/approvals/` - `/app/notebook/messages/` - `/app/notebook/files/` - `/app/notebook/to-dos/` - `/app/notebook/agenda/` - `/app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `wcag-contrast-ratio-checker`