Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/socrates-lesson-pathways/qualification/ job / candidate # Lesson pathways โ€” qualification The distinct qualification record for Lesson pathways. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: job:socrates:lesson-pathways **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: qualification **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Socrates **Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity **Owner status**: PROPOSED **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs โ€” builder overview]() โ€” Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Qualification status **Result**: NOT RUN **Disposition**: HELD **Reviewer**: Not recorded **Receipt**: Not recorded This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect. ### Lane-specific instrument aids No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane. ## Outcome definitions **Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect. **Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason. **Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer. **Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent. The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only. ## Proposed deterministic acceptance tests Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded. - A valid package contains the question, learner level, bounded outcome, ordered steps, prerequisites, completion criteria, source records, reviewer boundary, and test receipt. - Each substantive claim has either a source locator or an explicit label of interpretation, uncertainty, or unresolved dispute. - The pathway preserves source IDs, provenance, revision state, lifecycle, and source SHA-256 when supplied; missing provenance causes Held rather than silent acceptance. - A source comparison shows at least the source positions and the question used to compare them; a doorway page or repeated keyword text is rejected. - A high-stakes instruction request is rejected from autonomous qualification and routed to Needs review or Held. - A request to invent a primary source, conceal disputed evidence, or present tutoring as authority is rejected and recorded as a failure. - Student identity data is not required for a pathway; if supplied, the record minimizes it, marks its presence, restricts visibility, and prevents public indexing. - A source dated after the lesson or claim is not used as contemporaneous evidence without an explicit chronology note. - Future-dated and past-dated deadlines are stored distinctly; ambiguous dates, impossible dates, and missing time zones fail validation. - Keyboard-only users can reach every field, source link, status control, and failure message in logical order. - Every control has an accessible name; status is not conveyed by color alone; errors identify the field and corrective action. - Drafting a message, enrollment request, publication request, or schedule change never produces an external effect and leaves a held receipt. - A failed or incomplete source fetch, attachment reference, checksum mismatch, permission boundary, or conflicting revision produces an explicit failure state and preserves the prior record. - Search and indexing expose only records permitted by visibility; private student or held records do not appear in public documentation or public Sites context. - Approval requires a named human reviewer and a receipt tied to the exact revision; later edits return the record to Needs review. ## Negative and held-state tests - Unsupported curriculum claims may be mistaken for established fact. - Tutor output may be mistaken for institutional, academic, medical, legal, or other high-stakes authority. - Invented, inaccessible, duplicated, or disputed sources may enter a pathway without detection. - Student identity or sensitive learning data may be collected unnecessarily or exposed through search, links, attachments, or messages. - Chronology errors may treat later commentary as contemporaneous evidence. - A named native surface may be mistaken for a connected provider, database, enrollment, publication, or production feature. - Failed imports, stale revisions, broken locators, and checksum mismatches may be hidden by a polished pathway. - Accessibility barriers may prevent learners or reviewers from inspecting sources, deadlines, status, or failure reasons. ## Qualification claim boundary ### Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence - This is a proposed, source-labelled learning-pathway specification. - Socrates is described by the supplied record as a proposed university guide and tutor entity. - The pathway can define questions, compare supplied sources, identify uncertainty, and structure inspectable inquiry steps. - The observed Notebook surfaces provide prototype or indexed interfaces for local drafting, inspection, deadlines, approvals, and records. ### Still held - That Socrates is qualified, accredited, employed by a university, or institutionally authorized. - That any learner is enrolled, assessed, certified, or receiving an official curriculum. - That sources were independently verified beyond the supplied records or that any external provider is connected. - That student identity data, databases, publication systems, calendars, messaging providers, or external enrollment are connected. - That a pathway is deployed, customer-indexed, published, authoritative, or complete. - That any uncertain, disputed, or interpretive claim is factual. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `agents/index.html#socrates` - `source_record:job:socrates:lesson-pathways` - `Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections` - `Observed native contract: deadlines` - `Observed native contract: records` - `Observed native contract: pointguard` - `App route: /app/notebook/field-guides/` - `App route: /app/notebook/approvals/` - `App route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `App route: /app/notebook/search/` - `Supplied source record: job:socrates:lesson-pathways`