Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/socrates-source-comparison/forms/ job / candidate # Source comparison โ€” forms The distinct forms record for Source comparison. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: job:socrates:source-comparison **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: package **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Socrates **Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity **Owner status**: PROPOSED **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs โ€” builder overview]() โ€” Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Proposed form sections Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth. ### Question and scope Define what is being compared and prevent unbounded research. - question_id - learner_question - topic - learning_level - purpose - scope_inclusions - scope_exclusions - requested_output - due_at - priority ### Source intake Capture inspectable source identity without inventing or silently normalizing evidence. - source_record_id - title - author_or_issuer - publication_date - source_type - locator - source_sha256 - provenance_note - access_status - relevant_excerpt - attachment_reference ### Claim extraction Separate source wording from interpretation and record evidentiary status. - claim_id - source_record_id - claim_text - exact_quote_or_paraphrase - location_in_source - claim_type - support_status - confidence_label - disputed_by - interpretation_note ### Comparison matrix Make agreement, contradiction, difference in scope, and missing evidence explicit. - comparison_id - claim_group - source_a_claim_id - source_b_claim_id - relationship - agreement_summary - difference_summary - omission_summary - unresolved_question - evidence_needed ### Learning path and handoff Turn the comparison into bounded study actions while preserving authority limits. - learning_goal - ordered_activity_ids - prerequisites - reflection_prompts - follow_up_sources - human_review_required - handoff_note - result_lifecycle ### Accessible state contract - Every field requires a visible and programmatic label. - Required and optional fields must be stated in text. - Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field. - Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone. ## Supporting documentation fields These fields come from the docs_urls lane and remain separate from the primary operating form. ### Question and learning aim Define what the learner is trying to understand before sources are compared. - central question - learner level or context - learning objective - known terms or definitions - high-stakes topic flag - desired output ### Source inventory Capture each source with provenance and enough context for inspection. - source title - author or issuing entity - publication date if known - source type - source locator - access or custody note - source status - source-specific limitation ### Claim examination Separate claims, evidence, interpretation, uncertainty, and disagreement. - claim text - claim owner or source - supporting passage or locator - evidence type - confidence label - disputed status - counterevidence - unresolved question ### Comparison frame Make the comparison criteria explicit rather than implying that one source is authoritative. - comparison criteria - scope alignment - definitions alignment - methods or evidence differences - agreement summary - material disagreement summary - missing evidence - inference warning ### Inspectable learning path Turn the comparison into bounded next steps that a learner can review and revise. - ordered question sequence - prerequisites - reading or review tasks - reflection prompts - verification checkpoints - stop or escalation condition - learner review note ### Human review and receipt Record review state and preserve what was proposed, accepted, held, or rejected. - reviewer - review state - decision note - held items - revision reason - receipt or source hash if available - next review date ## Required or proposed record references No record existence is asserted by this documentation page. - source comparison job record with canonical ID, owner, lifecycle, provenance, source locator, source SHA-256 when available, revision, tags, links, and attachments - one source record per compared item - claim record for each material assertion, including support status and uncertainty note - comparison matrix record containing matched claims, differences, omissions, and unresolved disputes - question record defining the learner's inquiry and scope - learning-path or field-guide record containing bounded steps and prerequisites - review or approval record for any high-stakes, disputed, or publication-adjacent result - todo records for evidence checks, follow-up questions, and review deadlines - source-comparison job record - source reference records - claim records - comparison notes - learning-path project record - review or approval record - agent log receipt ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `agents/index.html#socrates` - `source_record:job:socrates:source-comparison` - `observed_native_contract:project_and_field_guide_collections` - `observed_native_contract:deadlines` - `observed_native_contract:records` - `observed_native_contract:pointguard` - `app_route:/app/pointguard/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/notes/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/files/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/projects/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/approvals/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/field-guides/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/search/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/to-dos/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/today/` - `allowed_instruments:verified_clean_only` - `observed_native_contract:web_boundary`