Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/socrates-study-records/field-guides/

job / candidate

# Study records — field guides

The distinct field guides record for Study records. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: job:socrates:study-records

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: docs_urls

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Socrates

**Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity

**Owner status**: PROPOSED

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs — builder overview](<https://guthlabs.ai/guth.html#builder>) — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Related field-guide records

- /app/notebook/field-guides/

Source-proposed guide paths are references, not proof that those paths resolve.

## Operating sequence

- Create a study-record proposal and assign a canonical ID.

- State the question, audience, objective, and high-stakes status.

- Collect only supplied or explicitly cited source material; preserve locators and provenance.

- Record claims separately from interpretation and mark disputed or unresolved evidence.

- Compare sources using an inspectable note or synthesis record.

- Compose a bounded learning path with prerequisites, practice, recall, and review points.

- Create deadlines and workbacks for reading, practice, source checking, and human review.

- Route high-stakes instruction, student identity data, external enrollment, and published curriculum claims to human review.

- Hold the record when evidence is missing, disputed evidence is hidden, or tutoring is being treated as authority.

- Preserve revisions, links, attachments, and review receipts before any later implementation decision.

## Handoff boundary

- Invented or unverifiable primary sources could mislead learners.

- Disputed evidence could be hidden by an overconfident synthesis.

- Tutoring could be mistaken for institutional, academic, legal, medical, or other authoritative instruction.

- Student identity data could be collected or exposed without an approved boundary.

- External enrollment or publication could occur without human authorization.

- Prototype routes could be mistaken for connected production features.

- Accessibility needs could be lost when study paths are generated from unstructured notes.

- Missing provenance, revisions, or source hashes could make a study record difficult to inspect or reproduce.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `agents/index.html#socrates`

- `source_record:job:socrates:study-records`

- `observed_native_contract.project_and_field_guide_collections`

- `observed_native_contract.deadlines`

- `observed_native_contract.records`

- `observed_native_contract.pointguard`

- `app_routes:/app/notebook/field-guides/`

- `app_routes:/app/notebook/agent-logs/`

- `app_routes:/app/notebook/projects/`

- `app_routes:/app/notebook/approvals/`

- `app_routes:/app/pointguard/`

- `Observed native contract: records preserve canonical IDs, provenance, source locators, source SHA-256, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, and attachments.`

- `Observed native contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface while specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners.`

- `Observed app route: /app/notebook/notes/`

- `Observed app route: /app/notebook/files/`

- `Observed app route: /app/notebook/approvals/`

- `Observed app route: /app/notebook/field-guides/`

- `Observed app route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/`

- `Observed app route: /app/notebook/search/`

- `Observed app route: /app/pointguard/`

- `Allowed verified instrument: statistics-suite-descriptive-stats`

- `Allowed verified instrument: correlation-covariance-calculator`