Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/socrates-study-records/forms/ job / candidate # Study records โ€” forms The distinct forms record for Study records. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: job:socrates:study-records **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: package **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Socrates **Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity **Owner status**: PROPOSED **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs โ€” builder overview]() โ€” Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Proposed form sections Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth. ### Inquiry scope Define the learning task without overstating the requested authority. - working title - student or audience description - question - learning objective - course or subject context - desired output - known constraints - high-stakes flag ### Sources and claims Capture inspectable evidence and distinguish sourced claims from interpretation. - source title - author or origin - source locator - source date if known - source excerpt or note - source SHA-256 if available - claim text - claim status: supported, disputed, unresolved, or interpretation - confidence rationale - alternative source or counterclaim ### Study path Turn the inquiry into bounded, reviewable learning steps. - ordered steps - prerequisites - reading or evidence per step - practice prompt - recall check - comparison task - expected learner artifact - accessibility or format needs ### Review and boundaries Record uncertainty, human review, deadlines, and prohibited effects. - reviewer - review due date - decision status: needs review, approved, or held - high-stakes instruction review required - student identity data present - external enrollment requested - published curriculum claim requested - open risks - receipt or linked approval ### Accessible state contract - Every field requires a visible and programmatic label. - Required and optional fields must be stated in text. - Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field. - Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone. ## Supporting documentation fields These fields come from the docs_urls lane and remain separate from the primary operating form. ### Question and learning objective Capture the inquiry without prematurely asserting an answer. - question_text - learning_objective - course_or_subject_context - prior_knowledge - desired_depth - student_supplied_constraints ### Sources and provenance Record which sources support, challenge, or contextualize the inquiry. - source_title - source_author - source_locator - source_type - source_date - source_sha256_if_available - source_origin - source_notes - source_status ### Claims and evidence Separate claims from evidence and make disagreement inspectable. - claim_text - claim_status - supporting_source_ids - contradicting_source_ids - evidence_excerpt_or_locator - confidence_label - dispute_notes - unknowns ### Learning path Turn the inquiry into ordered, reviewable study steps. - step_title - step_purpose - prerequisite_record_ids - activity_type - expected_artifact - estimated_duration - completion_state - review_required ### Authority and safety boundaries Identify gates that prevent the record from being mistaken for authoritative instruction or external action. - high_stakes_instruction_flag - student_identity_data_present - external_enrollment_requested - published_curriculum_claim - tutoring_not_authority_acknowledged - human_review_required ### Review and revision Preserve ownership, changes, and unresolved issues. - reviewer - review_state - review_notes - revision_summary - next_review_due_at - receipt_locator ## Required or proposed record references No record existence is asserted by this documentation page. - canonical study-record ID with origin, source locator, source SHA-256, provenance, revision, lifecycle, tags, links, and attachments - question or inquiry record - source record with citation and provenance fields - claim record with confidence and dispute status - comparison or synthesis record - learning-path project record - deadline or review to-do record - human-review receipt for high-stakes instruction or publication-related decisions - job:socrates:study-records - question record - source record - claim record - study-path record - uncertainty or dispute record - review receipt ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `agents/index.html#socrates` - `source_record:job:socrates:study-records` - `observed_native_contract.project_and_field_guide_collections` - `observed_native_contract.deadlines` - `observed_native_contract.records` - `observed_native_contract.pointguard` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/field-guides/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/projects/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/approvals/` - `app_routes:/app/pointguard/` - `Observed native contract: records preserve canonical IDs, provenance, source locators, source SHA-256, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, and attachments.` - `Observed native contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface while specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners.` - `Observed app route: /app/notebook/notes/` - `Observed app route: /app/notebook/files/` - `Observed app route: /app/notebook/approvals/` - `Observed app route: /app/notebook/field-guides/` - `Observed app route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `Observed app route: /app/notebook/search/` - `Observed app route: /app/pointguard/` - `Allowed verified instrument: statistics-suite-descriptive-stats` - `Allowed verified instrument: correlation-covariance-calculator`