Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/socrates-study-records/qualification/ job / candidate # Study records โ€” qualification The distinct qualification record for Study records. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: job:socrates:study-records **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: qualification **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Socrates **Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity **Owner status**: PROPOSED **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs โ€” builder overview]() โ€” Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Qualification status **Result**: NOT RUN **Disposition**: HELD **Reviewer**: Not recorded **Receipt**: Not recorded This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect. ### Lane-specific instrument aids No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane. ## Outcome definitions **Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect. **Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason. **Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer. **Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent. The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only. ## Proposed deterministic acceptance tests Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded. - Qualification passes only when the record has a canonical ID, proposed owner, bounded question, learning objective, visibility state, and human-review state. - Qualification passes only when every claim links to at least one supplied or user-provided source record, or is explicitly labelled unsupported, uncertain, or unresolved. - A source with no locator, provenance, or inspectable content cannot support a qualified claim; the claim is Held or marked unsupported. - A disputed source or claim is visibly labelled disputed and remains in the comparison set; it cannot be presented as settled fact. - A request to invent a primary source, citation, quotation, or publication date fails and produces a Held state with an explanatory receipt. - A request to conceal conflicting evidence fails and leaves the conflicting evidence visible to the reviewer. - A record containing student identity data beyond the minimum fields fails privacy review unless explicit retention consent and restricted visibility are recorded. - Sensitive student details are excluded from search indexing and public-facing contexts; no customer or public index is assumed or claimed. - High-stakes instruction requests fail automatic qualification and require human review; tutoring language must not imply professional, institutional, or grading authority. - External enrollment, provider writes, publication, customer effects, and database authority remain Held regardless of requested action or named interface. - The ordered path must be acyclic: every dependency refers to an existing step, and a cycle produces a deterministic chronology failure. - Due dates must be valid calendar values; a dependent step cannot be due before its prerequisite unless an explicit reviewed exception exists. - Revisions preserve prior values, source references, and reviewer receipts; overwriting evidence without a revision record fails chronology and provenance review. - Keyboard-only users can reach every field, expand source evidence, inspect uncertainty labels, change visibility, and submit for review. - Every field has a programmatic label, errors are text-identifiable and adjacent to the relevant field, focus moves to the first blocking error, and status is not conveyed by color alone. - Contrast and text alternatives meet the designated accessibility review requirement; no image or visual comparison is required for qualification. - A missing source, owner, consent state, reviewer, deadline rule, or authority rationale produces a deterministic Held state rather than a partial qualification. - Search results respect visibility partitions and show source labels, lifecycle, and review state; private or Held records are not presented as public or qualified. - The final receipt records inputs, source locators, claims reviewed, chronology result, privacy result, authority result, accessibility result, failures, reviewer, and proposal status. ## Negative and held-state tests - Socrates may be mistaken for a university, instructor of record, accrediting body, or curriculum authority. - Named skills and native surfaces are proposals or prototypes and do not prove connected web features or deployment. - Student identity, enrollment, grades, disability information, or other sensitive data could be retained or indexed unnecessarily. - A polished learning path could disguise unsupported claims, disputed evidence, or missing prerequisites. - Copied or paraphrased material could lose provenance, licensing context, source date, or revision history. - Deadlines may be interpreted as official course deadlines when they are only local planning dates. - High-stakes academic, medical, legal, financial, or safety instruction may exceed bounded tutoring authority. - External messages, enrollment, publication, credentialing, or customer-facing effects could be inferred from draft surfaces. - A source comparison may create false equivalence by treating all sources as equally authoritative without an explicit rationale. - Accessibility failures could prevent keyboard, screen-reader, low-vision, or cognitive-access users from inspecting uncertainty and review state. ## Qualification claim boundary ### Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence - This is a proposal for qualification of a Socrates study-record job. - The package defines bounded tutoring, source comparison, inspectable claims, learning paths, privacy controls, and human review. - The observed contract includes local Notebook and PointGuard surfaces with held external effects. - The supplied source record identifies Socrates as proposed and names its gates and never-rules. ### Still held - Socrates is deployed, connected, or production-ready. - Socrates is a university, accredited tutor, instructor of record, or authoritative curriculum publisher. - Any provider, credential, enrollment, database, customer index, publication, or external message effect exists. - A study record is qualified merely because a native surface or named skill exists. - Any source, claim, deadline, course route, or curriculum statement is verified without an inspectable supplied record. - Student identity data is safely stored, indexed, or shared. - This package provides high-stakes instruction or official academic advice. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `agents/index.html#socrates` - `source_record:job:socrates:study-records` - `job:socrates:study-records:qualification` - `Observed native contract: Notebook records, deadlines, PointGuard, and held web boundary` - `Observed app routes: /app/notebook/notes/, /app/notebook/files/, /app/notebook/to-dos/, /app/notebook/field-guides/, /app/notebook/approvals/, /app/notebook/agent-logs/, /app/notebook/search/`