Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/socrates-study-records/tools/

job / candidate

# Study records — tools

The distinct tools record for Study records. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: job:socrates:study-records

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: package

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Socrates

**Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity

**Owner status**: PROPOSED

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs — builder overview](<https://guthlabs.ai/guth.html#builder>) — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Authoritative package lane tools and interfaces

### Canonical tools-page assignments

- **Citation sextant** (skill · required) — Proposed skill for locating and checking citation context without inventing primary sources.

- **Claim examiner** (skill · required) — Proposed skill for separating supported, disputed, unresolved, and interpretive claims.

- **Recall prism** (interface · required) — Proposed study surface for recall checks and learner practice.

- **Research notebook** (record · required) — Proposed record surface for source-labelled notes, comparisons, and revisions.

- **PointGuard** (interface · required) — Observed cross-app context surface for carrying the current study record while Notebook remains the execution and canonical-record owner.

Only the page's admitted lane is rendered as an assignment. Other lane inventories remain source records but are not merged here. Tool kind and required/optional status are preserved.

## Authoritative lane instrument assignments

### Canonical tools-page assignments

No verified instrument is assigned to this tools lane.

An instrument listed only for another lane does not become a tools-page assignment.

## Use boundary

- Invented or unverifiable primary sources could mislead learners.

- Disputed evidence could be hidden by an overconfident synthesis.

- Tutoring could be mistaken for institutional, academic, legal, medical, or other authoritative instruction.

- Student identity data could be collected or exposed without an approved boundary.

- External enrollment or publication could occur without human authorization.

- Prototype routes could be mistaken for connected production features.

- Accessibility needs could be lost when study paths are generated from unstructured notes.

- Missing provenance, revisions, or source hashes could make a study record difficult to inspect or reproduce.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `agents/index.html#socrates`

- `source_record:job:socrates:study-records`

- `observed_native_contract.project_and_field_guide_collections`

- `observed_native_contract.deadlines`

- `observed_native_contract.records`

- `observed_native_contract.pointguard`

- `app_routes:/app/notebook/field-guides/`

- `app_routes:/app/notebook/agent-logs/`

- `app_routes:/app/notebook/projects/`

- `app_routes:/app/notebook/approvals/`

- `app_routes:/app/pointguard/`