Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/socrates-uncertainty-marking/forms/ job / candidate # Uncertainty marking โ€” forms The distinct forms record for Uncertainty marking. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: job:socrates:uncertainty-marking **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: package **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Socrates **Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity **Owner status**: PROPOSED **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs โ€” builder overview]() โ€” Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Proposed form sections Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth. ### Question and learning goal Define the inquiry without presupposing an answer. - question_text - learning_goal - audience_level - subject_area - scope_inclusions - scope_exclusions ### Evidence and sources Capture inspectable source context and prevent unsupported attribution. - source_title - source_author_or_institution - source_locator - source_type - source_date - source_reference_or_file_link - source_sha256_if_available - quoted_or_paraphrased_passage - access_notes ### Claim register Separate facts, interpretations, hypotheses, and unresolved disputes. - claim_text - claim_category - confidence_label - supporting_source_ids - contradicting_source_ids - assumptions - known_limitations - last_reviewed_at ### Comparison and synthesis Make agreement, disagreement, and missing evidence visible. - comparison_basis - areas_of_agreement - areas_of_disagreement - method_or_definition_differences - missing_evidence - provisional_synthesis - alternative_interpretations ### Learning path and review Turn the inquiry into bounded, reviewable work. - ordered_learning_steps - prerequisites - learner_checks - review_owner - review_due_at - escalation_reason - approval_state ### Accessible state contract - Every field requires a visible and programmatic label. - Required and optional fields must be stated in text. - Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field. - Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone. ## Supporting documentation fields These fields come from the docs_urls lane and remain separate from the primary operating form. ### Question and learning context Define what the learner is trying to understand without assuming authority or filling gaps with invented facts. - question_text - learning_goal - course_or_topic_context - learner_level - known_constraints - desired_output_type ### Sources and evidence Capture inspectable source material and preserve provenance for later review. - source_title - source_type - source_locator - source_excerpt_or_summary - source_date_if_known - source_sha256_if_available - provenance_note - source_status ### Claim and uncertainty marking Separate claims from evidence and make disagreement, limitations, and unknowns visible. - claim_text - claim_scope - uncertainty_label - supporting_source_ids - contradicting_source_ids - reason_for_label - missing_evidence - last_reviewed_at ### Learning path Turn the inquiry into bounded, ordered steps with checks for understanding. - step_title - step_purpose - prerequisites - activity - expected_artifact - completion_condition - reviewer_or_owner ### Boundary and review Identify gates before material is treated as instruction, curriculum, or consequential advice. - high_stakes_flag - student_identity_data_present - external_enrollment_requested - published_curriculum_claim - human_review_required - approval_status - held_reason ## Required or proposed record references No record existence is asserted by this documentation page. - source-labelled notes for claims and evidence - file references for source materials - project record for the learning path - to-dos for review deadlines and unresolved questions - approval record for high-stakes or publishable claims - agent log recording authority, proposed actions, and receipts - canonical job record with owner_agent, owner_role, lifecycle, gates, and never rules - question note with learner wording and scope - source-labelled note for each supplied source or evidence item - claim record with confidence or uncertainty label and rationale - comparison record linking claims to sources - field-guide or project record for the learning path - todo records for review checkpoints - approval record for high-stakes or publication-sensitive output - agent-log record containing proposed work, authority boundary, and receipt ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `agents/index.html#socrates` - `source_record:job:socrates:uncertainty-marking` - `observed_native_contract.project_and_field_guide_collections` - `observed_native_contract.deadlines` - `observed_native_contract.records` - `observed_native_contract.pointguard` - `app_routes:/app/pointguard/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/notes/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/files/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/to-dos/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/approvals/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/field-guides/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `app_routes:/app/notebook/search/` - `Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections` - `Observed native contract: deadlines` - `Observed native contract: records` - `Observed native contract: pointguard` - `Observed native contract: web_boundary` - `App route: /app/notebook/notes/` - `App route: /app/notebook/field-guides/` - `App route: /app/notebook/approvals/` - `App route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `App route: /app/pointguard/`