Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/socrates-uncertainty-marking/qualification/ job / candidate # Uncertainty marking โ€” qualification The distinct qualification record for Uncertainty marking. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: job:socrates:uncertainty-marking **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: qualification **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Socrates **Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity **Owner status**: PROPOSED **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs โ€” builder overview]() โ€” Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Qualification status **Result**: NOT RUN **Disposition**: HELD **Reviewer**: Not recorded **Receipt**: Not recorded This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect. ### Lane-specific instrument aids No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane. ## Outcome definitions **Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect. **Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason. **Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer. **Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent. The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only. ## Proposed deterministic acceptance tests Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded. - A valid record contains a claim, scope, uncertainty label, source status, ownership, lifecycle, and revision identifier. - The system rejects or holds a claim with no source reference when the claim is presented as source-backed. - The system rejects invented primary-source metadata and preserves an explicit Unsupported or Unresolved state instead. - Two conflicting supplied sources produce a Disputed or Unresolved label plus links to both sources and an explanation of the conflict. - A claim marked Established-by-supplied-evidence cannot be used outside the recorded scope without a new review. - Student identity data is optional, minimized, access-restricted, and excluded from public or broadly indexed contexts by default. - High-stakes instruction, external enrollment, and published curriculum claims cannot reach Approved without a human reviewer receipt. - Final messages remain drafts or Held; no provider, credential, enrollment, database, customer, or publication effect is asserted. - Revision history preserves the prior claim, sources, labels, reviewer action, and reason for change. - Keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic labels, error text, and non-color-only status indicators are present for every form control. - Screen-reader output names each uncertainty label, source status, review status, and failure reason. - Search returns only records permitted by visibility and source partition rules; held private records are not exposed as public results. - If a source cannot be opened or verified, the interface states that verification is unavailable and offers Hold, replace-source, or reviewer-escalation actions. ## Negative and held-state tests - Tutor output may be mistaken for institutional, academic, medical, legal, or enrollment authority. - Generated recollection may be mistaken for evidence. - A confidence score may imply unsupported mathematical precision. - Disputed evidence may be collapsed into a single answer. - Missing or inaccessible sources may be silently replaced by invented citations. - Student identity or sensitive learning information may leak through notes, search, messages, or PointGuard context. - A native route may be mistaken for a connected provider, publication system, or authoritative database. - Deadline automation may create unintended external communication or enrollment effects. - Accessibility failures may hide uncertainty labels, source conflicts, or Held states. - Duplicate documentation pages could become doorway content or keyword-spam. ## Qualification claim boundary ### Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence - The proposal describes a bounded teaching and inquiry profile. - The package can require source labels, uncertainty markers, revision history, and human review. - The supplied source identifies Socrates as a proposed University guide and tutor entity. - Local prototype or indexed surfaces may be named as intended review locations. ### Still held - Socrates is deployed, connected, or authoritative. - Any provider, database, credential, enrollment, customer index, or publication workflow is connected. - Claims have been qualified, verified, or approved in production. - A curriculum, course route, primary-source packet, or citation tool is available as a live service. - Student data is stored in protected production infrastructure. - Any app route performs external sends, writes, publication, or enrollment. - Qualification has completed for any individual claim. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `agents/index.html#socrates` - `source_record:job:socrates:uncertainty-marking` - `observed_native_contract.records` - `observed_native_contract.pointguard` - `observed_native_contract.web_boundary` - `app_route:/app/notebook/notes/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/approvals/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/search/` - `app_route:/app/notebook/messages/`