Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/tilly-grant-research-and-drafts/field-guides/

job / candidate

# Grant research and drafts — field guides

The distinct field guides record for Grant research and drafts. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: job:tilly:grant-research-and-drafts

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: docs_urls

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Tilly

**Owner role**: Pointguard and independent reviewer

**Owner status**: WORKING

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs — builder overview](<https://guthlabs.ai/guth.html#builder>) — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Related field-guide records

- /app/notebook/field-guides/

Source-proposed guide paths are references, not proof that those paths resolve.

## Operating sequence

- Create or update the research brief and project link.

- Capture each opportunity from a source-labelled record; preserve locator, provenance, revision, and source hash when available.

- Extract explicit eligibility, dates, deliverables, and restrictions into a qualification record.

- Create a deadline workback with source deadline, time zone, internal review deadline, correction buffer, and submission-owner checkpoint.

- Collect applicant and project evidence in Notebook notes and linked file references; do not imply hidden upload or protected storage.

- Map each material claim to a citation and record contradictory or missing evidence.

- Run qualification checks and mark unresolved requirements as unclear or held rather than guessing.

- Draft application sections using only reviewed or clearly labelled provisional evidence.

- Use the claim examiner and citation checks to identify unsupported, overstated, or conflicting language.

- Submit the dossier and draft to an independent reviewer; Tilly must not approve her own evidence.

- Record revisions, decisions, receipts, and handoff state in the agent log and approvals surface.

- Hold final publication, funding commitments, credential access, and edits to another agent’s source until the designated owner or human approves.

## Handoff boundary

- Grant pages and requirements may change; preserve source revisions and access dates.

- A directory or index may be mistaken for an official funder source; require an official source locator for qualification.

- Eligibility language may be ambiguous; do not convert interpretation into fact.

- Draft impact, capacity, budget, or outcome claims may exceed receipts.

- Conflicting sources may be silently reconciled; preserve both and escalate.

- Deadline time zones and submission channels may be misread.

- Sensitive applicant, credential, or financial information may be placed in an unprotected local record; minimize collection and keep credential access held.

- A draft may be mistaken for a submitted application or public claim.

- Tilly may be pressured to approve her own evidence; enforce independent review.

- Native app routes are prototypes or indexes and do not prove connected web behavior.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `agents/index.html#tilly`

- `source_record:job:tilly:grant-research-and-drafts`

- `native contract: records preserve canonical IDs, origin, source locators, source SHA-256, provenance, revision, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions`

- `native contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface; specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners`

- `native contract: current GuthHub app routes are local prototypes or indexes; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held`

- `source record existing tools: Pointguard; Instrument catalog; Claim examiner; Citation checks`

- `source record existing guides: Instrument packets; Qualification records; Grant dossiers; Public-claim routes`

- `source record principal gates: Final publication; Funding commitments; Credential access; Changes to another agent's source`

- `source record never rules: Approve her own evidence; Hide a contradiction; Turn a draft into a public claim`

- `job:tilly:grant-research-and-drafts`

- `Observed native contract: Notebook records and revisions`

- `Observed native contract: PointGuard persistent cross-app context surface`

- `Observed app routes: /app/pointguard/, /app/notebook/field-guides/, /app/notebook/approvals/, /app/notebook/paper/, /app/notebook/agent-logs/`
