Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/tilly-independent-review/forms/ job / candidate # Independent review โ€” forms The distinct forms record for Independent review. This page is proposal-only. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: job:tilly:independent-review **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: package **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Tilly **Owner role**: Pointguard and independent reviewer **Owner status**: WORKING **Qualification result**: NOT RUN ยท held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs โ€” builder overview]() โ€” Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Proposed form sections Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth. ### Review brief Define the review target, owner, scope, and requested decision without assuming authority. - review title - requesting agent or person - target record IDs - review question - scope included - scope excluded - owner of canonical source - requested completion date - priority - conflict-of-interest declaration ### Evidence inventory Record the evidence examined and preserve source provenance. - evidence record ID - source locator - source type - source SHA-256 if available - origin - revision - date examined - citation or attachment reference - evidence status - missing evidence ### Checks and findings Apply bounded review checks and distinguish findings from conclusions. - instrument or method checked - qualification requirement - claim examined - supporting receipt IDs - contradiction found - scope overrun - uncertainty or limitation - severity - recommended action - reviewer notes ### Disposition and receipt Document a recommendation while keeping publication, funding, credential, and source-change decisions with their owners. - recommendation: needs review, approved locally, or held - decision owner - decision deadline - conditions to proceed - unresolved questions - receipt summary - escalation target - reviewer sign-off - final publication status: held ### Accessible state contract - Every field requires a visible and programmatic label. - Required and optional fields must be stated in text. - Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field. - Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone. ## Supporting documentation fields These fields come from the docs_urls lane and remain separate from the primary operating form. ### Review intake Define the review subject, owner, scope, and source boundary before inspecting evidence. - review title - subject record ID - requesting agent or person - reviewer ID - review scope - out-of-scope areas - source locator - source SHA-256 when available - review start date - target review date - visibility - linked PointGuard room ### Evidence and claims Map each material claim to its receipts and record gaps without converting drafts into public claims. - claim ID - claim text - claim status: draft, supported, contradicted, or held - supporting source IDs - source locator - receipt type - source revision - confidence note - contradiction note - missing evidence - recommended disposition ### Qualification and instrument checks Record reproducible checks of instruments and qualification criteria, including limitations and errata. - instrument slug - input fixture or test case - expected behavior - observed result - instrument status - test date - operator - qualification rule - failure or errata note - evidence attachment reference - retest required ### Grant and publication gates Separate grant preparation and public-claim routing from approval, funding, credential, and publication decisions. - grant or claim package ID - request type - decision owner - required approvals - funding commitment status - credential-access status - publication status - held reason - proposed next reviewer - receipt links - decision deadline ### Review receipt Close the review with a bounded conclusion and preserve the audit trail. - review outcome - supported claims - held claims - contradictions surfaced - unresolved questions - records created or revised - reviewer statement - handoff owner - handoff date - final receipt ID ## Required or proposed record references No record existence is asserted by this documentation page. - source-labelled review brief - instrument packet - qualification record - grant dossier - citation-check record - claim examination record - contradiction or gap record - review receipt - approval or hold decision - deadline and workback to-do - source-labelled evidence record - instrument work record - public-claim route record - approval record when a principal gate is reached ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `agents/index.html#tilly` - `source_record:job:tilly:independent-review` - `Observed native contract: PointGuard persistent cross-app context surface; specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners.` - `Observed native contract: Notebook records preserve canonical IDs, provenance, source locators, source SHA-256, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions.` - `Observed native contract: Notebook approvals support Needs review, Approved, and Held states with receipts.` - `Observed native contract: current GuthHub routes are local prototypes or indexes; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held.` - `observed_native_contract.records` - `observed_native_contract.pointguard` - `observed_native_contract.web_boundary` - `app:/app/pointguard/` - `app:/app/notebook/agent-logs/` - `app:/app/notebook/approvals/` - `app:/app/notebook/notes/` - `app:/app/notebook/files/` - `app:/app/notebook/field-guides/` - `app:/app/notebook/search/` - `allowed_instrument:checksum-verifier` - `allowed_instrument:binary-text-diff-similarity-ratio` - `allowed_instrument:url-query-string-parser`