Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/jobs/tilly-independent-review/tools/

job / candidate

# Independent review — tools

The distinct tools record for Independent review. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: job:tilly:independent-review

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: package

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Tilly

**Owner role**: Pointguard and independent reviewer

**Owner status**: WORKING

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Agent jobs — builder overview](<https://guthlabs.ai/guth.html#builder>) — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Authoritative package lane tools and interfaces

### Canonical tools-page assignments

- **Pointguard** (interface · required) — Provides the persistent cross-app context for the current independent review without becoming the canonical owner of specialist records.

- **Instrument catalog** (record · required) — Provides the review target for instrument identity, status, and packet evidence; no instrument is treated as verified beyond the supplied directory.

- **Claim examiner** (skill · required) — Tests whether a claim is supported by the supplied evidence and exposes claims that outrun their receipts.

- **Citation checks** (skill · required) — Checks source locators, provenance, revisions, and citation completeness.

- **Notebook Agent Logs** (interface · required) — Preserves work, authority boundaries, findings, and receipts for later inspection.

- **Notebook Approvals** (interface · required) — Routes recommendations to human or owning-agent decisions while keeping final publication and other principal gates held.

Only the page's admitted lane is rendered as an assignment. Other lane inventories remain source records but are not merged here. Tool kind and required/optional status are preserved.

## Authoritative lane instrument assignments

### Canonical tools-page assignments

No verified instrument is assigned to this tools lane.

An instrument listed only for another lane does not become a tools-page assignment.

## Use boundary

- Self-approval or conflict of interest can invalidate the review.

- A draft recommendation may be mistaken for approval, qualification, publication, or deployment.

- Citation presence alone may be mistaken for evidentiary support.

- Instrument catalog status may be treated as proof of a connected provider or production capability.

- A missing source hash, locator, revision, or attachment can make a receipt non-reproducible.

- Contradictions may be suppressed when records are summarized too aggressively.

- Grant or funding review may be mistaken for a funding commitment.

- Credential review may be mistaken for credential issuance or access.

- Changing another agent’s source would violate the stated authority boundary.

- Private or held evidence may be exposed through an overly broad public route.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `agents/index.html#tilly`

- `source_record:job:tilly:independent-review`

- `Observed native contract: PointGuard persistent cross-app context surface; specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners.`

- `Observed native contract: Notebook records preserve canonical IDs, provenance, source locators, source SHA-256, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions.`

- `Observed native contract: Notebook approvals support Needs review, Approved, and Held states with receipts.`

- `Observed native contract: current GuthHub routes are local prototypes or indexes; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held.`