Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/claim-examiner/ tool / candidate # Claim examiner Proposal-only review tool for examining claims against supplied evidence, reconciling source differences, marking uncertainty, and routing decisions to independent owners. It does not publish claims, approve evidence, alter another agent's source, provide high-stakes instruction, or grant authority. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: tool:claim-examiner **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: contract **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Tilly, Socrates **Owner role**: Pointguard and independent reviewer, University guide and tutor entity **Owner status**: Not separately recorded **Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Tools — overview]() — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Bounded contract Proposal-only review tool for examining claims against supplied evidence, reconciling source differences, marking uncertainty, and routing decisions to independent owners. It does not publish claims, approve evidence, alter another agent's source, provide high-stakes instruction, or grant authority. ### Owners - Tilly - Socrates ### Inputs - A draft claim or claim set - Supplied source records and primary-source packets - Citation and evidence rules - Contradictory or disputed evidence - Review context and requested decision type - Applicable gate or escalation requirement ### Outputs - Evidence-to-claim comparison - Supported, unsupported, disputed, or unresolved status - Contradiction and uncertainty notes - Citation and source-quality observations - Independent-review recommendation - Escalation record for principal gates - Proposal-only lesson or publication review notes ## Required or proposed record references The list defines expected records; it does not assert that any record instance exists. - Claim text and scope - Source identifiers and provenance - Evidence excerpts or supplied evidence references - Comparison and reconciliation notes - Uncertainty and contradiction log - Reviewer identity and independence record - Decision owner and escalation destination - Final disposition record ## Route contract The links below are this site's admitted canonical public records. Source-lane route suggestions are proposals only and are not represented as live or canonical until separately admitted. [01**overview**/docs/tools/claim-examiner/]()[02**usage**/docs/tools/claim-examiner/usage/]()[03**boundaries**/docs/tools/claim-examiner/boundaries/]()[04**qualification**/docs/tools/claim-examiner/qualification/]() ### Held source-proposed extensions - /docs/claim-examiner/scope-and-boundary — defines examination versus approval, publication, tutoring, and authority - /docs/claim-examiner/evidence-reconciliation — records source comparison, contradictions, provenance, and unresolved disputes - /docs/claim-examiner/gate-routing — explains escalation for publication, funding, credentials, high-stakes instruction, identity data, enrollment, and curriculum claims - /docs/claim-examiner/reviewer-independence — specifies independent review and the prohibition on approving one's own evidence - /docs/instrument-packets: Explain how an instrument packet should support qualification review and identify missing records. - /docs/qualification-records: Define the evidence and uncertainty needed before an instrument can be treated as qualified. - /docs/grant-dossiers: Show how claim examination supports grant research and drafts without converting drafts into public claims. - /docs/public-claim-routes: Describe review boundaries for website claims and publication routing. - /docs/teaching-protocols: Distinguish guided inquiry and tutoring from authority or high-stakes instruction. - /docs/primary-source-packets: Provide source-comparison and contradiction-preservation guidance. - /docs/course-routes: Map lesson pathways and published curriculum claims to review checkpoints. - /docs/citation-rules: Specify how supplied sources and disputed evidence should be recorded. - /docs/claim-examiner/overview - /docs/claim-examiner/input-record - /docs/claim-examiner/evidence-reconciliation - /docs/claim-examiner/contradictions-and-uncertainty - /docs/claim-examiner/independent-review - /docs/claim-examiner/principal-gates - /docs/claim-examiner/accessibility-privacy-abuse - /docs/claim-examiner/qualification-tests - /docs/claim-examiner/authority-and-publication - /docs/claim-examiner/source-register These extension paths are not generated by this record and must not be treated as resolving routes. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `source_record:tool:claim-examiner` - `agents/index.html#tilly` - `agents/index.html#socrates`