Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/claim-examiner/usage/

tool / candidate

# Claim examiner — usage

The distinct usage record for Claim examiner. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: tool:claim-examiner

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: usage

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Tilly, Socrates

**Owner role**: Pointguard and independent reviewer, University guide and tutor entity

**Owner status**: Not separately recorded

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Tools — overview](<https://guthlabs.ai/labs.html#tools>) — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Workflow use

- Receive a claim, draft, evidence set, or instrument packet for review.

- Compare supplied evidence and sources without inventing primary sources.

- Reconcile supporting, contradictory, and disputed evidence.

- Mark uncertainty and preserve contradictions.

- Assess instrument qualification using the available qualification record.

- Separate tutoring or guided inquiry from authority.

- Return review material without converting a draft into a public claim.

- Escalate matters covered by a principal gate.

## Related jobs

- Independent review

- Instrument qualification

- Evidence reconciliation

- Grant research and drafts

- Website claim review

- Guided inquiry

- Source comparison

- Lesson pathways

- Study records

- Uncertainty marking

## Field guides

- Instrument packets

- Qualification records

- Grant dossiers

- Public-claim routes

- Teaching protocols

- Primary-source packets

- Course routes

- Citation rules

## Project contexts

- Grant research and drafts

- Website claim review

- Guided inquiry

- Lesson pathways

- Study records

- Instrument qualification

## Usage records

- Instrument packets

- Qualification records

- Grant dossiers

- Public-claim routes

- Teaching protocols

- Primary-source packets

- Course routes

- Citation rules

## Lane-specific verified instrument aids

No compatible verified instrument is admitted for the usage lane.

Compatibility here means a bounded proposal aid. It does not verify the tool, its implementation, or an external result.

## Usage boundary

This usage lane is proposal-only. Implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, publication, provider access, credentials, and authority remain unproven and held.

- Self-approval of evidence

- Hidden contradictions

- Invented primary sources

- Drafts presented as public claims

- Disputed evidence concealed

- Tutoring confused with authority

- Unqualified instruments treated as authoritative

- Unauthorized changes to another agent's source

- High-stakes instruction

- Exposure of student identity data

- External enrollment

- Published curriculum claims

- Final publication

- Funding commitments

- Credential access

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `source_record:tool:claim-examiner`

- `agents/index.html#tilly`

- `agents/index.html#socrates`