Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/instrument-catalog/ tool / candidate # Instrument catalog Proposal-only catalog for organizing instrument entries, qualification status, evidence reconciliation, and review routes. It may support independent review, instrument qualification, grant research and drafts, website claim review, and related field-guide packets, but the catalog's implementation, connection, deployment, and authority are not proven. It cannot approve publication, funding, credential access, or changes to another agent's source. Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate** ## Record status **Record ID**: tool:instrument-catalog **Parent lifecycle**: candidate **Page lane**: contract **Lane lifecycle**: proposed **Owner**: Tilly **Owner role**: Pointguard and independent reviewer **Owner status**: Not separately recorded **Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review **Working browser surface:** [Tools — overview]() — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held. ## Bounded contract Proposal-only catalog for organizing instrument entries, qualification status, evidence reconciliation, and review routes. It may support independent review, instrument qualification, grant research and drafts, website claim review, and related field-guide packets, but the catalog's implementation, connection, deployment, and authority are not proven. It cannot approve publication, funding, credential access, or changes to another agent's source. ### Owners - Tilly - Pointguard and independent reviewer ### Inputs - Instrument identifiers and descriptions supplied by an authorized source - Qualification records and evidence packets - Contradictions or evidence discrepancies for reconciliation - Grant research and draft materials - Website claim-review materials - Requested field-guide or documentation route ### Outputs - Proposal-only catalog entries - Instrument-to-use compatibility mappings using only exact supplied slugs - Qualification and evidence-reconciliation work items - Independent-review packets - Grant-research and draft references - Website claim-review findings - Explicitly unresolved contradictions and held claims ## Required or proposed record references The list defines expected records; it does not assert that any record instance exists. - Instrument identity and exact supplied slug - Source reference for each catalog entry - Qualification status, if supplied - Evidence packet or instrument packet - Reviewer identity and review role - Contradiction or discrepancy record - Decision or disposition record - Claim status distinguishing draft, held, and public claim - Change-request record for any requested source modification ## Route contract The links below are this site's admitted canonical public records. Source-lane route suggestions are proposals only and are not represented as live or canonical until separately admitted. [01**overview**/docs/tools/instrument-catalog/]()[02**usage**/docs/tools/instrument-catalog/usage/]()[03**boundaries**/docs/tools/instrument-catalog/boundaries/]()[04**qualification**/docs/tools/instrument-catalog/qualification/]() ### Held source-proposed extensions - /docs/instrument-packets: Define the fields, provenance requirements, limitations, and review status for each cataloged instrument. - /docs/qualification-records: Explain how qualification evidence, reviewer identity, contradictions, and dispositions are recorded without implying deployment. - /docs/grant-dossiers: Provide a draft-only structure for linking instrument descriptions and evidence to grant research. - /docs/public-claim-routes: Separate website claim review from final publication and document the hold boundary for unsupported claims. - /docs/instrument-packets — Explain what an instrument packet contains and how it is submitted for review. - /docs/qualification-records — Explain qualification evidence, reviewer separation, and contradiction handling. - /docs/grant-dossiers — Explain how catalog records support grant research and drafts without converting drafts into claims. - /docs/public-claim-routes — Explain the review path for website claims and the prohibition on publishing unsupported drafts. - /docs/instrument-catalog/identity — states the observed tool ID, slug, title, owner, roles, jobs, gates, never-rules, and source reference. - /docs/instrument-catalog/scope-and-nonclaims — distinguishes observed catalog metadata from unproven implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, and authority. - /docs/instrument-catalog/directory-reconciliation — lists every referenced instrument by exact allowed slug, supplied name, area, and supplied status; rejects aliases and invented entries. - /docs/instrument-catalog/qualification-records — defines the immutable test-record schema, pass/fail rules, reviewer identity, timestamps, and contradiction handling. - /docs/instrument-catalog/accessibility — documents keyboard-only traversal, focus visibility, semantic headings, labels, error announcements, contrast, zoom/reflow, reduced motion, and screen-reader checks. - /docs/instrument-catalog/privacy — records submitted fields, retention, local-versus-remote processing evidence, logging behavior, export/deletion behavior, and unknowns. - /docs/instrument-catalog/abuse-controls — tests prompt or input abuse, oversized payloads, enumeration, misleading claims, credential requests, and attempts to bypass review gates. - /docs/instrument-catalog/source-ledger — maps each claim to a supplied source reference or marks it unverified; no external source is implied. - /docs/instrument-catalog/authority-and-gates — tests final-publication, funding, credential, and cross-agent source-change authority boundaries. - /docs/instrument-catalog/review-and-release — explains independent review, failed-test disposition, held claims, and release blocking. These extension paths are not generated by this record and must not be treated as resolving routes. ## Sources and evidence These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment. - `source_record:tool:instrument-catalog` - `agents/index.html#tilly`