Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/pointguard/

tool / candidate

# Pointguard

Proposal-only independent review and evidence-reconciliation tool for instrument qualification, grant research and drafts, and website claim review. It identifies contradictions and authority-boundary issues for human owners; it does not approve publication, funding, credentials, source changes, or public claims.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: tool:pointguard

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: contract

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Tilly

**Owner role**: Pointguard and independent reviewer

**Owner status**: Not separately recorded

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Tools — overview](<https://guthlabs.ai/labs.html#tools>) — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Bounded contract

Proposal-only independent review and evidence-reconciliation tool for instrument qualification, grant research and drafts, and website claim review. It identifies contradictions and authority-boundary issues for human owners; it does not approve publication, funding, credentials, source changes, or public claims.

### Owners

- Tilly

- Pointguard and independent reviewer

### Inputs

- Evidence submitted for independent review

- Instrument qualification materials

- Grant research and draft materials

- Website claims and supporting sources

- Requested review gate: final publication, funding commitment, credential access, or source change

### Outputs

- Structured review findings

- Evidence reconciliation record

- Contradiction register

- Qualification review record

- Draft-versus-public-claim status

- Escalation recommendation to an independent reviewer or responsible owner

## Required or proposed record references

The list defines expected records; it does not assert that any record instance exists.

- Submitted evidence inventory

- Source and provenance record

- Independent review assignment

- Evidence reconciliation record

- Contradiction register

- Instrument qualification record

- Grant dossier review record

- Public-claim review record

- Decision and escalation log

- Reviewer independence attestation

## Route contract

The links below are this site's admitted canonical public records. Source-lane route suggestions are proposals only and are not represented as live or canonical until separately admitted.

[01**overview**/docs/tools/pointguard/](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/pointguard/>)[02**usage**/docs/tools/pointguard/usage/](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/pointguard/usage/>)[03**boundaries**/docs/tools/pointguard/boundaries/](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/pointguard/boundaries/>)[04**qualification**/docs/tools/pointguard/qualification/](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/pointguard/qualification/>)

### Held source-proposed extensions

- /docs/pointguard/review-boundary: Defines independent review, evidence reconciliation, and non-approval limits.

- /docs/pointguard/qualification-records: Specifies the proposed record structure for instrument qualification and unresolved findings.

- /docs/pointguard/contradiction-register: Explains how conflicting evidence is recorded without concealment.

- /docs/pointguard/public-claim-review: Separates draft material from claims eligible for public publication.

- /docs/pointguard/gate-escalation: Describes escalation for publication, funding, credential, and source-change gates.

- /docs/pointguard-independent-review: Explain the independent-review workflow, reviewer separation, evidence handling, and escalation behavior.

- /docs/pointguard-instrument-qualification: Define the records and checks needed to qualify an instrument; do not imply that Pointguard itself is qualified to approve instruments.

- /docs/pointguard-grant-dossiers: Describe grant research and draft review using grant dossiers, with unresolved evidence clearly marked.

- /docs/pointguard-public-claims: Explain website claim review and the prohibition on turning drafts into public claims without review.

- /docs/pointguard-principal-gates: Document review controls for final publication, funding commitments, credential access, and changes to another agent's source.

- /docs/pointguard/overview — purpose, scope, lifecycle, and non-authority notice.

- /docs/pointguard/governance — owners, independent-review requirement, never-rules, and principal gates.

- /docs/pointguard/instrument-packets — required packet contents and evidence inventory procedure.

- /docs/pointguard/qualification-records — deterministic qualification fields, statuses, failures, and contradiction handling.

- /docs/pointguard/evidence-reconciliation — source precedence, discrepancy logging, and unresolved-evidence rules.

- /docs/pointguard/grant-dossiers — research and draft handling without converting drafts into funding commitments.

- /docs/pointguard/public-claim-routes — claim review, publication boundary, and held-claim labels.

- /docs/pointguard/accessibility-privacy-abuse — testable accessibility, data-minimization, privacy, and misuse controls.

- /docs/pointguard/authority-boundaries — prohibited self-approval, credential access, source changes, and unsupported authority claims.

- /docs/pointguard/review-records/example — redacted schema example using only supplied facts and explicit unknowns.

These extension paths are not generated by this record and must not be treated as resolving routes.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `source_record:tool:pointguard`

- `agents/index.html#tilly`
