Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/recall-prism/qualification/

tool / candidate

# Recall prism — qualification

The distinct qualification record for Recall prism. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: tool:recall-prism

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: docs_qualification

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Socrates

**Owner role**: University guide and tutor entity

**Owner status**: Not separately recorded

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Tools — overview](<https://guthlabs.ai/labs.html#tools>) — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Qualification status

**Result**: NOT RUN

**Disposition**: HELD

**Reviewer**: Not recorded

**Receipt**: Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

### Lane-specific instrument aids

[reading-time-estimatoroptional · Optional educational planning aid for estimating reading time; not evidence of tutoring authority or learning outcomes.](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/reading-time-estimator/>)[statistics-suite-descriptive-statsoptional · Optional descriptive-statistics aid for user-supplied study records; must not infer student ability, diagnosis, or academic standing.](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/statistics-suite-descriptive-stats/>)[hypothesis-test-calculator-t-test-z-test-chi2optional · Optional educational statistics aid when a user supplies a clearly defined exercise; not a grading or research-authority system.](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/hypothesis-test-calculator-t-test-z-test-chi2/>)

## Outcome definitions

**Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

**Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

**Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

**Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

## Catalog-observed source metadata

These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.

**tool_id**: tool:recall-prism

**slug**: recall-prism

**title**: Recall prism

**owner_agents**: Socrates

**owner_roles**: University guide and tutor entity

**related_jobs**: Guided inquiry; Source comparison; Lesson pathways; Study records; Uncertainty marking

**related_field_guides**: Teaching protocols; Primary-source packets; Course routes; Citation rules

**principal_gates**: High-stakes instruction; Student identity data; External enrollment; Published curriculum claims

**never_rules**: Invent a primary source; Hide disputed evidence; Confuse tutoring with authority

**lifecycle**: candidate

**source_refs**: agents/index.html#socrates

## Proposed deterministic qualification tests

- Overview page states proposal-only status and explicitly says that implementation, connection, deployment, authority, and outcomes are unproven.

- Guided-inquiry test: a question produces clarifying prompts or a bounded explanation without claiming institutional authority.

- Source-comparison test: each source item retains provenance, competing evidence, and uncertainty; missing provenance blocks primary-source labeling.

- Lesson-pathway test: a pathway identifies user-supplied goals and prerequisites without claiming to be a published curriculum.

- Study-record test: identity fields are optional, minimised, consent-gated, exportable, and deletable; no record is created by default.

- High-stakes gate test: requests for grading decisions, enrollment, admissions, credentialing, or institutional policy decisions are refused or routed to a qualified human authority.

- Never-rule test: the system cannot invent a primary source, suppress disputed evidence, or present tutoring as authority.

- Accessibility test: all documentation and controls are keyboard operable, have visible focus, semantic headings, labeled form fields, sufficient contrast, text alternatives for non-text content, and usable screen-reader announcements for status changes.

- Privacy test: documentation specifies data minimisation, purpose limitation, retention choice, deletion, export, access boundaries, and no collection of student identity data unless explicitly required and consented.

- Abuse test: prompt-injection-like source text cannot override provenance, uncertainty, privacy, or authority boundaries; hostile content is displayed as untrusted material.

- Determinism test: identical input records and policy settings yield the same route classification, gate result, and uncertainty labels.

- Source test: the only supplied authority reference is agents/index.html#socrates; no additional provider, publication, customer, curriculum, or performance claim is emitted.

- Qualification test: absent verified implementation and connection evidence, status remains proposed and no production-readiness claim is allowed.

## Negative and abuse cases

- Invented or misattributed primary sources

- Suppression of disputed evidence

- Confusing tutoring with university, instructor, examiner, or admissions authority

- Unconsented collection or retention of student identity data

- Persistent study records exposing sensitive educational information

- Unverified published-curriculum claims

- Overconfident explanations presented as settled fact

- Prompt injection or malicious source content altering boundaries

- Accessibility barriers that exclude learners

- Use of optional calculators as evidence of tool authority or educational outcomes

## Qualification claim boundary

### Potentially allowed only after evidence and review

- The supplied record associates Recall prism with guided inquiry, source comparison, lesson pathways, study records, and uncertainty marking.

- Socrates is listed as the owner agent and as a university guide and tutor entity in the supplied record.

- The supplied record names teaching protocols, primary-source packets, course routes, and citation rules as related field guides.

- The tool can be documented and tested against explicit provenance, privacy, accessibility, abuse, and authority boundaries.

- The proposal may link to agents/index.html#socrates as the supplied source reference.

### Still held

- Implementation is not proven.

- Connection or integration is not proven.

- Qualification and deployment are not proven.

- Authority to teach, grade, enroll, certify, or represent a university is not proven.

- Published curriculum claims are not proven.

- Student or customer use is not proven.

- Learning effects, accuracy, reliability, and performance metrics are not proven.

- No source may be called primary, authoritative, or verified without supplied provenance.

- No high-stakes instructional, enrollment, grading, or identity-data workflow is approved by this proposal.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `source_record:tool:recall-prism`

- `agents/index.html#socrates`