Source: https://guthlabs.ai/docs/tools/swiftui/qualification/

tool / candidate

# SwiftUI — qualification

The distinct qualification record for SwiftUI. This page is proposal-only.

Status: **proposed**Lifecycle: **candidate**

## Record status

**Record ID**: tool:swiftui

**Parent lifecycle**: candidate

**Page lane**: docs_qualification

**Lane lifecycle**: proposed

**Owner**: Tim

**Owner role**: Apple platform specialist

**Owner status**: Not separately recorded

**Qualification result**: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

**Working browser surface:** [Tools — overview](<https://guthlabs.ai/labs.html#tools>) — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

## Qualification status

**Result**: NOT RUN

**Disposition**: HELD

**Reviewer**: Not recorded

**Receipt**: Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

### Lane-specific instrument aids

[wcag-contrast-ratio-checkeroptional · Proposal-only contrast calculations for documented accessibility examples; does not qualify a SwiftUI implementation or prove WCAG conformance.](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/wcag-contrast-ratio-checker/>)[regex-testeroptional · Deterministic checking of documented route, identifier, and metadata patterns; does not validate Apple APIs or runtime behavior.](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/regex-tester/>)[checksum-verifieroptional · Optional integrity check for archived documentation artifacts; does not establish source authority or implementation authenticity.](<https://guthlabs.ai/docs/instruments/checksum-verifier/>)

## Outcome definitions

**Verified**: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

**Failed**: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

**Needs review**: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

**Held**: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

## Catalog-observed source metadata

These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.

**tool_id**: tool:swiftui

**slug**: swiftui

**title**: SwiftUI

**owner_agents**: Tim

**owner_roles**: Apple platform specialist

**related_jobs**: Swift and SwiftUI implementation; Apple platform discovery; App Intents and Spotlight; Cross-device product families; Native capability qualification

**related_field_guides**: iOS 27; iPadOS 27; macOS 27; Liquid Glass; Apple capability index

**principal_gates**: New entitlements; Store submission; Production credentials; Scope outside authorized Apple files

**never_rules**: Race another writer; Claim an unavailable API; Publish or submit without approval

**lifecycle**: candidate

**source_refs**: agents/index.html#tim

## Proposed deterministic qualification tests

- AT-01 Identity: every page names tool_id tool:swiftui, slug swiftui, title SwiftUI, owner Tim, and source reference agents/index.html#tim.

- AT-02 Proposal boundary: pages state that implementation, connection, API availability, entitlements, credentials, deployment, and publication authority are unproven unless separately evidenced.

- AT-03 Route distinctness: each documentation route contains route-specific fields and tests; no route is a duplicate alias of another route.

- AT-04 Platform separation: iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS 27 appear as separate review dimensions, with unknown or unsupported claims held rather than inferred.

- AT-05 API claim discipline: an API or capability cannot be marked available without a supplied source or verification record; otherwise the result is unverified or held.

- AT-06 Entitlement gate: any new entitlement produces a blocking status until authorization and approval evidence are recorded.

- AT-07 Release gate: store submission and production credentials remain blocked until explicit approval is recorded.

- AT-08 Scope gate: a request naming files outside the authorized Apple-file boundary fails qualification and is marked held.

- AT-09 Never-rule compliance: no workflow step races another writer, claims an unavailable API, publishes or submits without approval, or expands beyond authorized Apple files.

- AT-10 Accessibility: each interactive example has a keyboard/focus path where applicable, accessible names, logical focus order, Dynamic Type review, VoiceOver review, contrast evidence where applicable, reduced-motion behavior where applicable, and non-color status communication.

- AT-11 Privacy: every data item has purpose, collection point, storage location, indexing or Spotlight exposure, retention, deletion behavior, and logging classification; unknown fields fail privacy qualification.

- AT-12 Abuse: test requests for unauthorized entitlement use, credential exfiltration, deceptive permission prompts, hidden tracking, unsafe automation, and unsupported platform assumptions; each must be rejected or held.

- AT-13 Source traceability: every normative claim links to a supplied source or is explicitly labeled proposed/unverified; the only supplied source reference is agents/index.html#tim.

- AT-14 Authority: reviewer identity, approval scope, timestamp, and decision are required before any qualified-for-review result becomes publishable.

- AT-15 Evidence integrity: archived qualification artifacts may be checksum-verified, but checksum success must not be treated as proof of API availability, authorship, or authority.

- AT-16 Failure determinism: missing evidence, contradictory platform claims, unavailable API claims, scope violations, privacy gaps, accessibility failures, abuse findings, or absent approval produce held or rejected status rather than a pass.

## Negative and abuse cases

- Treating the catalog observation as proof that a working SwiftUI tool or implementation exists.

- Inventing Apple APIs, deployment behavior, Liquid Glass behavior, App Intents support, Spotlight integration, or cross-device effects.

- Assuming iOS 27, iPadOS 27, or macOS 27 availability without supplied evidence.

- Requesting or using new entitlements without approval.

- Using production credentials or attempting store submission without authorization.

- Publishing documentation that implies implementation, connection, qualification, or authority has been established.

- Expanding beyond authorized Apple files or repository boundaries.

- Exposing private user data through App Intents, Spotlight, logs, analytics, previews, or examples.

- Creating inaccessible controls, focus traps, unreadable contrast, motion hazards, or color-only status indicators.

- Enabling deceptive permission prompts, unsafe automation, privilege escalation, or credential collection.

- Relying on a calculator or integrity check as a substitute for platform documentation, review, or authority.

## Qualification claim boundary

### Potentially allowed only after evidence and review

- The agent catalog contains an observed entry named SwiftUI with tool_id tool:swiftui and slug swiftui.

- Tim is listed as the owner and Apple platform specialist.

- The source record associates the entry with Swift and SwiftUI implementation, Apple platform discovery, App Intents and Spotlight, cross-device product families, and native capability qualification.

- The source record lists iOS 27, iPadOS 27, macOS 27, Liquid Glass, and Apple capability index as related field guides.

- The source record identifies new entitlements, store submission, production credentials, and scope outside authorized Apple files as principal gates.

- The source record supplies the never-rules: race no other writer, claim no unavailable API, publish or submit only with approval.

- The documentation and tests proposed here can preserve uncertainty, record evidence, and gate release decisions.

### Still held

- That a SwiftUI implementation exists or is connected.

- That any Apple API, App Intent, Spotlight integration, Liquid Glass feature, or platform capability is available.

- That the tool can compile, run, deploy, sign, submit to a store, or access production credentials.

- That Tim or any listed owner has authority to approve publication, entitlements, credentials, or store submission.

- That the related field guides are current, authoritative, or sufficient for qualification.

- That any documentation route proves runtime accessibility, privacy compliance, security, safety, or platform conformance.

- That the compatible instruments validate SwiftUI behavior or Apple authority.

## Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

- `source_record:tool:swiftui`

- `agents/index.html#tim`
