Scope and process map
Scope and intake, process map, baseline, and scenario register.
One workflow
Business workflow audits
Map one repeatable workflow so owners can see AI steps, approvals, and recovery.
Planned service · Inquiries open · Scope and availability agreed together.
What this helps with
This review follows real process steps using authorized examples. It makes baseline evidence explicit when available and says unknown when it is not. The outcome offers options; implementation remains a separate decision.
Good fit
An operations owner has a new AI step, repeated rework, or unclear accountability in one business process.
What you get
Evidence-linked findings
Findings tied to evidence, plus an acceptance and retest plan.
30/60/90-day choices
Prioritized 30/60/90-day choices, including DIY, vendor, process-only, and no-change paths.
Coverage and retest definitions
Coverage and retest definitions with counts only where actually measured.
How it works
- Map: Set the process boundary and walk authorized examples with owners, approvals, and recovery.
- Assess: Record the baseline where available and examine AI data, permissions, review, and effects.
- Choose: Keep owner decisions visible and deliver prioritized 30/60/90-day options.
Details and examples
Full planned process
- Freeze the process boundary and exclusions.
- Walk the real process with authorized examples, owners, inputs, outputs, approvals, and recovery.
- Record a measured baseline or label it unknown.
- Map AI data, permissions, review, and downstream effects.
- Use pre-agreed non-production scenarios.
- Assess evidence, consequence, sample frequency, detectability, and reversibility separately.
- Let the owner mark findings accepted, disputed, withdrawn, or unresolved.
- Deliver prioritized 30/60/90-day choices.
Scope and starting point
- Starts with
- A repeatable process and accountable operations owner.
- Leaves you with
- Evidence-linked findings and 30/60/90-day choices.
- Does not provide
- A model-security or legal review.
Example: Inquiry to proposal
Illustrative example
Inquiry to proposal
A fictional advisory workflow has an obsolete rate card, an undocumented peer check, an unlisted service suggestion, and an unclear correction process. The example claims no customer, savings, or measured result.
Questions
Will consequential cases run in production?
No. Redacted authorized examples are the default and consequential cases belong in a sandbox.
Does this promise savings or reduced risk?
No. Such claims need later measurement and are not assumed from the review.
What happens to disputed findings?
They remain visible in the record. Any implementation and retest are scoped separately.
Scope, availability, timing, and price are agreed before work starts.
Talk about this service
We can agree the scope before work begins.
Discuss a business audit