Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

field guide / candidate

Channel rules — examples

The distinct examples record for Channel rules. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
field-guide:channel-rules
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
plan
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Rebecca
Owner role
Not separately recorded
Owner status
Not separately recorded
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Hypothetical scenarios

A reviewer opens the Channel rules guide for bounded local rehearsals. Every fixture uses invented placeholders, performs no provider or external action, and remains held until source evidence and human review are recorded.

1. Guided inquiry fixture

A reviewer records a bounded question, links only supplied source references, and marks every unanswered point Needs review.

Fixture ID
channel-rules-example-001
Evidence
Hypothetical source placeholders only
Decision
HELD · human review required
External effects
None

2. Source comparison fixture

A reviewer compares two hypothetical source locators, preserves disagreement, and holds any conclusion until provenance is supplied.

Fixture ID
channel-rules-example-002
Evidence
Hypothetical source placeholders only
Decision
HELD · human review required
External effects
None

3. Uncertainty and pathway fixture

A reviewer constructs a local procedure or study pathway with checkpoints while labelling uncertainty and leaving external effects Held.

Fixture ID
channel-rules-example-003
Evidence
Hypothetical source placeholders only
Decision
HELD · human review required
External effects
None

4. Potentially allowed claim fixture

A hypothetical claim may advance only when its exact evidence locator, scope, reviewer, and decision rationale are recorded; this fixture asserts no fact.

Fixture ID
channel-rules-example-004
Evidence
Hypothetical source placeholders only
Decision
HELD · human review required
External effects
None

5. Held claim fixture

A hypothetical unsupported claim remains Held with missing evidence and human-review rationale visible; it is not published or indexed.

Fixture ID
channel-rules-example-005
Evidence
Hypothetical source placeholders only
Decision
HELD · human review required
External effects
None

Filled example fields

Scope and ownership fixture

Declare the bounded work, owner, source, and current lifecycle before preparation begins.

guide title
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
owner agent
Named human or Agent owner required
related jobs
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
source record ID
fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)
source locator
fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)
source SHA-256
fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)

Channel rule set fixture

Capture the rules that govern each proposed channel without inventing rules not present in the source record.

channel name
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
rule statement
Held — pending human review
rule source or locator
fixture-source-001 (hypothetical; no external claim)
audience
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
content boundary
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
required asset types
Example value to be supplied and reviewed

Draft preparation fixture

Create a reviewable draft tied to its channel rules and source evidence.

draft title
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
channel
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
purpose
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
body text
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
call to action
Example value to be supplied and reviewed
proposed timing
Example value to be supplied and reviewed

Review questions

  • A new activity can be created with an owner, channel, objective, source references, visibility, and planned performance date.
  • Every milestone has an owner, due date, completion state, and visible dependency or blocker field.
  • A draft can link to source notes, asset references, intended recipients, accessibility checks, and a revision identifier.
  • An approval record visibly shows Needs review, Approved, or Held and includes reviewer, decision deadline, and rationale.
  • A held approval prevents the guide from representing the draft as sent, published, or externally scheduled.
  • File records display local reference metadata and linked records without presenting hidden upload or protected-storage behavior.
  • Agenda changes are visibly drafts and do not write to an external provider.
  • Post-performance records preserve source locator, provenance, revision, and unresolved questions.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • source_record:field-guide:channel-rules
  • agents/index.html#rebecca
  • observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections
  • observed native contract: deadlines
  • observed native contract: records
  • observed native contract: pointguard
  • /app/notebook/field-guides/
  • /app/notebook/agent-logs/
  • /app/notebook/approvals/
  • /app/notebook/messages/
  • /app/notebook/files/
  • /app/notebook/notes/
  • Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections
  • Observed native contract: deadlines
  • Observed native contract: records
  • Observed native contract: pointguard
  • /app/pointguard/
  • /app/notebook/projects/
  • /app/notebook/agenda/
  • /app/notebook/to-dos/
  • /app/notebook/search/