Page actions
field guide / candidate
Channel rules — qualification
The distinct qualification record for Channel rules. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- field-guide:channel-rules
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- docs_urls
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Rebecca
- Owner role
- Not separately recorded
- Owner status
- Not separately recorded
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Qualification status
- Result
- NOT RUN
- Disposition
- HELD
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Receipt
- Not recorded
This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.
Lane-specific instrument aids
No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane.
Outcome definitions
- Verified
- All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
- Failed
- One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
- Needs review
- Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
- Held
- Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.
The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.
Proposed deterministic acceptance tests
Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.
- Every documentation route has a distinct purpose and content block: overview, steps, tools, forms, examples, qualification, or related jobs.
- Overview identifies the owner agent Rebecca, all five related jobs, proposal-only lifecycle, and held external effects.
- Steps preserve record ownership: Notebook owns notes, messages, files, approvals, to-dos, agenda drafts, and agent logs as applicable.
- Form fields support source locators, provenance, revisions, deadlines, accessibility, asset state, approval state, and performance evidence.
- A missing source locator, reviewer, timezone, asset reference, or approval decision produces a visible Needs review or Held state.
- No page claims deployment, provider connection, credential use, database authority, customer indexing, publication, live scheduling, or qualification.
- An accessibility review checks headings, keyboard access, labels, focus order, status announcements, contrast, and non-color status cues.
- A route test confirms private work and public documentation are partitioned and that proposed records remain distinguishable from indexed or prototype surfaces.
- A related-job page links only to Social planning, Draft preparation, Asset coordination, Approval routing, and Post-performance records, with a distinct explanation of handoff ownership.
- A post-performance example cannot display a metric unless it has an explicit evidence locator and measurement date.
Negative and held-state tests
- Treating a channel rule or draft as a live channel integration.
- Confusing local approval with permission to publish externally.
- Publishing unsupported performance claims or inventing live metrics.
- Using asset references as though files were uploaded or stored in a protected vault.
- Missing timezone, review deadline, or workback dependency.
- Doorway documentation pages that repeat the same channel keywords without distinct user value.
- Accessibility failures in status badges, forms, keyboard navigation, or approval states.
- Unclear ownership when PointGuard carries context but Notebook owns the canonical record.
Qualification claim boundary
Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence
- This guide proposes a source-backed workflow for social planning, draft preparation, asset coordination, approval routing, and post-performance record preparation.
- Notebook surfaces can be used as local or indexed prototype workflow surfaces according to their stated route labels.
- Approval states, provenance, revisions, deadlines, and held outcomes should be recorded explicitly.
- External publication and performance reporting require separately verified evidence and human review.
Still held
- Deployment or production readiness
- Provider, credential, database, or customer connection
- Live channel access, external scheduling, or publication
- Customer indexing or public distribution of private work
- Qualification, certification, or guaranteed performance outcome
- Live metrics or post-performance results without a supplied source record
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
source_record:field-guide:channel-rulesagents/index.html#rebeccaObserved native contract: project_and_field_guide_collectionsObserved native contract: deadlinesObserved native contract: recordsObserved native contract: pointguard/app/notebook/field-guides//app/notebook/notes//app/notebook/files//app/notebook/messages//app/notebook/approvals//app/notebook/agent-logs/