Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

field guide / candidate

Channel rules — qualification

The distinct qualification record for Channel rules. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
field-guide:channel-rules
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
docs_urls
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Rebecca
Owner role
Not separately recorded
Owner status
Not separately recorded
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result
NOT RUN
Disposition
HELD
Reviewer
Not recorded
Receipt
Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Lane-specific instrument aids

No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane.

Outcome definitions

Verified
All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
Failed
One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
Needs review
Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
Held
Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

  • Every documentation route has a distinct purpose and content block: overview, steps, tools, forms, examples, qualification, or related jobs.
  • Overview identifies the owner agent Rebecca, all five related jobs, proposal-only lifecycle, and held external effects.
  • Steps preserve record ownership: Notebook owns notes, messages, files, approvals, to-dos, agenda drafts, and agent logs as applicable.
  • Form fields support source locators, provenance, revisions, deadlines, accessibility, asset state, approval state, and performance evidence.
  • A missing source locator, reviewer, timezone, asset reference, or approval decision produces a visible Needs review or Held state.
  • No page claims deployment, provider connection, credential use, database authority, customer indexing, publication, live scheduling, or qualification.
  • An accessibility review checks headings, keyboard access, labels, focus order, status announcements, contrast, and non-color status cues.
  • A route test confirms private work and public documentation are partitioned and that proposed records remain distinguishable from indexed or prototype surfaces.
  • A related-job page links only to Social planning, Draft preparation, Asset coordination, Approval routing, and Post-performance records, with a distinct explanation of handoff ownership.
  • A post-performance example cannot display a metric unless it has an explicit evidence locator and measurement date.

Negative and held-state tests

  • Treating a channel rule or draft as a live channel integration.
  • Confusing local approval with permission to publish externally.
  • Publishing unsupported performance claims or inventing live metrics.
  • Using asset references as though files were uploaded or stored in a protected vault.
  • Missing timezone, review deadline, or workback dependency.
  • Doorway documentation pages that repeat the same channel keywords without distinct user value.
  • Accessibility failures in status badges, forms, keyboard navigation, or approval states.
  • Unclear ownership when PointGuard carries context but Notebook owns the canonical record.

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

  • This guide proposes a source-backed workflow for social planning, draft preparation, asset coordination, approval routing, and post-performance record preparation.
  • Notebook surfaces can be used as local or indexed prototype workflow surfaces according to their stated route labels.
  • Approval states, provenance, revisions, deadlines, and held outcomes should be recorded explicitly.
  • External publication and performance reporting require separately verified evidence and human review.

Still held

  • Deployment or production readiness
  • Provider, credential, database, or customer connection
  • Live channel access, external scheduling, or publication
  • Customer indexing or public distribution of private work
  • Qualification, certification, or guaranteed performance outcome
  • Live metrics or post-performance results without a supplied source record

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • source_record:field-guide:channel-rules
  • agents/index.html#rebecca
  • Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections
  • Observed native contract: deadlines
  • Observed native contract: records
  • Observed native contract: pointguard
  • /app/notebook/field-guides/
  • /app/notebook/notes/
  • /app/notebook/files/
  • /app/notebook/messages/
  • /app/notebook/approvals/
  • /app/notebook/agent-logs/