Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

field guide / candidate

Current-work packets — qualification

The distinct qualification record for Current-work packets. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
field-guide:current-work-packets
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
docs_urls
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Stan
Owner role
Not separately recorded
Owner status
Not separately recorded
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result
NOT RUN
Disposition
HELD
Reviewer
Not recorded
Receipt
Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Lane-specific instrument aids

No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane.

Outcome definitions

Verified
All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
Failed
One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
Needs review
Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
Held
Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

  • The overview route explains the packet purpose, ownership boundary, lifecycle label, related jobs, and held effects without claiming deployment or qualification.
  • Each documentation route has distinct useful content: overview, procedural steps, form specification, worked example, qualification criteria, or one related-job adaptation.
  • A packet cannot be accepted without an owner, scope boundary, source context, next action, deadline decision, and review status.
  • Facts, assumptions, unknowns, source locators, and revisions are visibly distinct and preserved.
  • A failed, blocked, stale, or conflicting check produces a visible failure state and does not silently advance the packet.
  • A proposed approval records the proposal and receipt while leaving the external effect Held until human review.
  • A handoff receipt includes packet ID, source context, current state, unresolved failures, next action, recipient, and deadline.
  • All forms are keyboard navigable, use explicit labels, expose validation errors in text, preserve entered values, and do not rely on color alone.
  • Related-job pages add job-specific acceptance checks and hazards rather than duplicating the overview page.
  • Search and Field Guides links identify the packet as proposed or held where applicable; no route implies provider connection, customer indexing, publication, or production state.

Negative and held-state tests

  • Confusing a local prototype or index with an operational connected feature.
  • Treating an agent's proposed action as an executed provider, credential, database, customer, publication, or production effect.
  • Losing provenance by overwriting source locators, hashes, revisions, or prior receipts.
  • Creating duplicate doorway pages with only changed job keywords and no distinct guidance.
  • Marking a packet qualified when evidence is incomplete, stale, contradictory, or held.
  • Exposing private or held work through an incorrectly scoped public documentation route.
  • Using deadlines without timezone, owner, dependency, or a recorded workback basis.
  • Handing off unresolved security, incident, fleet, or implementation risk without explicit containment and recipient acknowledgement.

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

  • This guide proposes a structure for source-backed current-work packets.
  • The guide can describe bounded steps, form fields, review states, deadlines, receipts, and handoff expectations.
  • The guide may link to named local prototype or index routes with their observed lifecycle labels.
  • The guide may state that provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held.

Still held

  • Deployment or production availability.
  • Connected provider, credential, database, customer, or publication behavior.
  • Canonical authority outside the designated specialist app or record owner.
  • Qualification, certification, security approval, incident resolution, or operational readiness.
  • Successful execution of any security, architecture, SRE, fleet, or handoff task.
  • Customer indexing, public publication, or external send.
  • Any claim that the named documentation or app route is a connected web feature.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • source_record:field-guide:current-work-packets
  • agents/index.html#stan
  • field-guide:current-work-packets
  • OBSERVED_NATIVE_CONTRACT.project_and_field_guide_collections
  • OBSERVED_NATIVE_CONTRACT.deadlines
  • OBSERVED_NATIVE_CONTRACT.records
  • OBSERVED_NATIVE_CONTRACT.pointguard
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/notebook/field-guides/
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/notebook/today/
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/notebook/notes/
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/notebook/files/
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/notebook/to-dos/
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/notebook/approvals/
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/notebook/agent-logs/
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/notebook/search/
  • APP_ROUTES:/app/pointguard/