Qualification records — qualification

The distinct qualification record for Qualification records. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID: field-guide:qualification-records
Parent lifecycle: candidate
Page lane: docs_urls
Lane lifecycle: proposed
Owner: Tilly
Owner role: Not separately recorded
Owner status: Not separately recorded
Qualification result: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result: NOT RUN
Disposition: HELD
Reviewer: Not recorded
Receipt: Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Lane-specific instrument aids

checksum-verifieroptional · Check whether supplied file or artifact digests match recorded qualification evidence.sha-256-hash-function-demooptional · Explain SHA-256 evidence concepts in an educational, non-authoritative example.

Outcome definitions

Verified: All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
Failed: One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
Needs review: Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
Held: Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

Every proposed documentation route has a distinct purpose and non-duplicative content.
The overview explains scope, audience, lifecycle, ownership, and held boundaries.
The steps page presents the ordered workflow and includes failure handling for missing, conflicting, or unverifiable evidence.
The tools page names only observed app surfaces and exact allowed instrument slugs.
The forms page includes canonical identity, source provenance, claim scope, review disposition, owner, and due-date fields.
An example distinguishes an observed verified-clean instrument status from a proposed qualification record and does not claim deployment or connection.
The admitted canonical qualification page defines evidence completeness, traceability, independent review, limitation disclosure, and held states.
Related-job pages explain distinct entry points and link back to the same record model without doorway duplication.
A missing source locator, conflicting revision, unavailable digest, or unsupported public claim produces a held or needs-review state.
Accessibility checks require labelled fields, keyboard-operable controls, visible focus, plain-language status labels, and non-color-only lifecycle indicators.
Acceptance does not assert provider connection, database authority, customer indexing, publication, deployment, or production state.

Negative and held-state tests

Confusing a verified-clean directory status with qualification of a particular customer use or result.
Treating a named native app surface as proof that a connected web feature exists.
Publishing unsupported claims because a local approval was recorded.
Losing provenance, revision, source locator, or digest metadata during reconciliation.
Using stale or errata-marked instrument behavior without preserving the observed status and limitation.
Creating duplicate doorway pages with near-identical qualification language.
Exposing private notes, attachments, customer information, or held work in proposed public documentation.
Treating a checksum or hash demonstration as proof of authorship, authenticity, safety, or production integrity.

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

This is a proposed field guide for source-backed qualification records.
The observed contract includes canonical IDs, provenance, revisions, lifecycle, links, attachments, and record revisions.
Notebook provides native surfaces for notes, files, to-dos, approvals, field guides, search, and agent logs as described in the supplied contract.
The allowed directory identifies exact instruments and observed statuses such as VERIFIED_CLEAN or VERIFIED_WITH_ERRATA.
Qualification records can preserve evidence, limitations, review decisions, and held states.

Still held

That the guide is deployed or publicly published.
That any provider, credential, database, customer, or production connection exists.
That an instrument is connected to an app or authoritative for a customer decision.
That local approval qualifies an instrument for regulated, commercial, clinical, financial, legal, or safety-critical use.
That any source, file, checksum, claim, grant, or website statement has been independently verified unless a specific receipt records that review.
That public indexing, customer indexing, external writes, exports, uploads, or publication effects occur.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

source_record:field-guide:qualification-records
agents/index.html#tilly
field-guide:qualification-records:docs_urls
Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections
Observed native contract: records
Observed native contract: deadlines
Observed native contract: pointguard
/app/notebook/field-guides/
/app/notebook/notes/
/app/notebook/files/
/app/notebook/to-dos/
/app/notebook/approvals/
/app/notebook/agent-logs/
/app/notebook/search/
/app/pointguard/
ALLOWED_INSTRUMENTS:checksum-verifier
ALLOWED_INSTRUMENTS:sha-256-hash-function-demo