Supabase field guide — qualification

Record status

Record ID

field-guide:supabase-field-guide

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

docs_urls

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Stan

Owner role

Not separately recorded

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

• The guide record contains the exact supplied source reference agents/index.html#stan.
• Every documentation route has distinct content: overview scope, steps, tools, forms, examples, qualification, or related-job mappings; no route is a keyword-only doorway.
• The overview states that lifecycle is proposed and that the supplied source does not prove deployment, provider connection, credential access, database authority, customer indexing, publication, or qualification.
• Each related job has an owner, scope, evidence requirement, deadline or workback, and failure state.
• Forms include source location, provenance, record ownership, review state, deadlines, and receipt references where applicable.
• Security and implementation claims are either source-backed, locally tested, or explicitly marked proposed, needs review, or held.
• Provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects have no unverified success state and remain human-held.
• Failures for missing evidence, stale revisions, conflicting records, inaccessible sources, and rejected approvals are represented without deletion of prior receipts.
• The guide can be opened from the Field Guides interface and linked to Notebook records without claiming that a connected web feature exists.
• A reviewer can deterministically identify the canonical guide record, related job records, supporting evidence, open risks, next deadline, and handoff receipt.

Negative and held-state tests

• The source record names Supabase but supplies no Supabase documentation, configuration, schema, security policy, deployment evidence, or operational telemetry.
• A named native surface does not prove a connected Supabase web feature or provider integration.
• Credential exposure, unauthorized database access, accidental customer-data handling, and unapproved external writes must remain held.
• Stale, conflicting, incomplete, or unverifiable source records can produce unsafe architecture or incident guidance.
• Security, SRE, fleet, and implementation advice may be mistaken for production qualification unless lifecycle and evidence labels remain visible.
• Local prototype routes may be mistaken for authoritative backend, provider, customer, publication, or deployment state.
• Accessibility failures may block reviewers; forms must support keyboard navigation, labels, readable status text, and non-color-only state cues.

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

• A proposed Supabase field guide is being designed.
• The guide is intended to organize source-bound work across security engineering, architecture and implementation, SRE and incident command, fleet operations, and receipt-backed handoffs.
• The guide uses explicit lifecycle, provenance, ownership, review, deadline, and receipt concepts.
• The supplied source identifies Stan as the owner agent and agents/index.html#stan as the source locator.

Still held

• Supabase is connected to Guth.
• Any provider, credential, database, customer, publication, or production effect exists.
• Any Supabase schema, policy, backup, incident process, fleet state, or deployment has been verified.
• The guide is qualified, indexed, published, customer-facing, or production-ready.
• Any security, architecture, SRE, or fleet recommendation has been validated against live Supabase behavior.
• Any external send, write, migration, credential operation, or incident action has occurred.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:field-guide:supabase-field-guide
• agents/index.html#stan