Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

job / candidate

Guided inquiry — qualification

The distinct qualification record for Guided inquiry. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
job:socrates:guided-inquiry
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
qualification
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Socrates
Owner role
University guide and tutor entity
Owner status
PROPOSED
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result
NOT RUN
Disposition
HELD
Reviewer
Not recorded
Receipt
Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Lane-specific instrument aids

No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane.

Outcome definitions

Verified
All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
Failed
One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
Needs review
Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
Held
Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

  • A complete inquiry stores a canonical ID, owner, lifecycle, source locator, provenance, revision, visibility, and an inspectable review receipt.
  • A claim without a source title and locator is labeled unresolved and cannot appear as established fact.
  • A source with missing or conflicting dates preserves both the known date values and the uncertainty; it is not silently reordered.
  • A disputed claim displays the competing evidence or an explicit missing-evidence note.
  • A request to invent a primary source is rejected, recorded as a failure state, and does not create a source record.
  • A request to hide disputed evidence is rejected and leaves the dispute visible to authorized reviewers.
  • A request to present tutoring as institutional or expert authority is rejected or held with an explicit authority disclaimer.
  • High-stakes instruction, student identity data, external enrollment, and published curriculum claims each produce Held status and require a named human reviewer.
  • No student identity field is required for ordinary inquiry intake; optional accommodation data is minimized and visibility-partitioned.
  • The form is operable by keyboard, has labeled controls, preserves focus after validation, exposes errors in text, and does not rely on color alone.
  • Learner-facing content has a plain-language option, semantic headings, readable contrast, and an equivalent text alternative for any non-text teaching artifact.
  • A source file reference records type and size and links to the inquiry; upload or protected storage remains held.
  • Draft messages identify recipients and source context, but final send remains human-held.
  • Draft schedule changes identify conflicts and due times, but external calendar effects remain held.
  • Search returns only records permitted by visibility and does not expose private student or accommodation data to public surfaces.
  • If a source, record, route, or proposed tool is unavailable, the system reports unavailable or held and preserves the inquiry without claiming completion.
  • No acceptance result claims deployment, provider connection, database authority, customer indexing, publication, or qualification.

Negative and held-state tests

  • Fabricated or unverifiable primary sources
  • Citation or locator omission
  • Disputed evidence hidden by summarization
  • Tutoring presented as institutional, grading, medical, legal, or other authority
  • Collection or exposure of unnecessary student identity data
  • Accessibility requirements omitted or treated as cosmetic
  • Chronology collapsed by replacing source dates with observation dates
  • Private inquiry records exposed through search or public context
  • A draft message, schedule, enrollment, or publication mistaken for an external effect
  • Unsupported curriculum claims presented as official
  • Ambiguous deadlines causing false completion
  • Failure states overwritten instead of preserved in record revisions

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

  • Socrates is a proposed teaching and inquiry profile.
  • The package is designed to structure questions, compare supplied sources, and build inspectable learning paths.
  • The package includes explicit authority, privacy, chronology, source, accessibility, and failure-state tests.
  • Named app routes and native contract surfaces are proposal references only.

Still held

  • That Socrates is deployed or qualified for production use.
  • That any provider, credential, database, enrollment, customer index, or publication connection exists.
  • That any source is authoritative unless its supplied record establishes that authority.
  • That a curriculum claim is official or published.
  • That a learner received instruction, a grade, an enrollment outcome, or a completed course route.
  • That any external message, calendar change, upload, or protected-storage action occurred.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • agents/index.html#socrates
  • source_record:job:socrates:guided-inquiry
  • source record: job:socrates:guided-inquiry
  • observed native contract: records preserve canonical IDs, provenance, source locators, source SHA-256, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions
  • observed native contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface and specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners
  • observed native contract: current GuthHub app routes are local prototypes or indexes and provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held
  • observed app route: /app/notebook/field-guides/
  • observed app route: /app/notebook/approvals/
  • observed app route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/