Source comparison — qualification

Record status

Record ID

job:socrates:source-comparison

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Socrates

Owner role

University guide and tutor entity

Owner status

PROPOSED

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

• A valid submission creates one canonical question record with owner Socrates, proposed lifecycle, scope, audience, and requested output.
• Every comparison claim links to at least one source record, or is explicitly labelled unsupported or unresolved.
• A source without a locator is rejected or visibly marked incomplete; it cannot be represented as verified evidence.
• A claim linked only to a source that does not address it is classified insufficiently sourced, not supported.
• When two supplied sources conflict, the result records both positions, source links, conflict text, and unresolved status; it does not silently select one.
• A chronology with missing, conflicting, or inferred dates displays the limitation and cannot receive a final chronology status.
• Changing a source, claim, comparison method, or disposition creates a revision and preserves the prior record.
• High-stakes instruction, student identity data, external enrollment, and published curriculum claims route to Needs review or Held.
• The workflow displays that Socrates is a proposed university guide and tutor entity and does not present tutoring as institutional, legal, medical, or academic authority.
• No output claims provider connection, database authority, customer indexing, publication, deployment, or qualification.
• A draft learning path contains ordered steps, prerequisites, source links, and at least one uncertainty or reflection prompt when evidence is disputed.
• The interface is keyboard operable, exposes labels and validation errors programmatically, preserves logical heading order, supports zoom and reflow, and does not rely on color alone for claim status.
• Private or student-identifying fields are excluded from public indexing and search results unless an explicit visibility record permits access.
• If a source reference, attachment, or record cannot be read, the workflow records a failure state and prevents unsupported comparison.
• If an agent action exceeds declared authority, the action is blocked, logged, and marked Held with a human-review requirement.

Negative and held-state tests

• Invented or fabricated primary sources
• Citation laundering or unsupported paraphrase
• Treating a confident or famous source as automatically authoritative
• Hiding disputed evidence behind a single summary
• Chronology errors caused by undated or conflicting sources
• Confusing tutoring with institutional, professional, or academic authority
• High-stakes educational guidance presented as settled instruction
• Collection or exposure of student identity data
• Accidental public indexing of private notes, files, or claims
• Unreviewed publication or external enrollment effects
• Doorway documentation that repeats keywords without useful comparison guidance
• Accessibility barriers in claim-status, source-link, or review controls
• Loss of provenance, source hash, revisions, or ownership
• Failure to distinguish unavailable evidence from negative evidence

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

• A proposed source-comparison job can structure questions and compare supplied sources.
• The workflow can preserve source labels, claim links, uncertainty, chronology notes, revisions, and review states.
• The workflow is intended to keep disputed evidence visible and distinguish tutoring from authority.
• The observed Notebook surfaces provide local prototype or indexed interfaces for notes, files, projects, field guides, approvals, search, and agent logs.
• External publication, enrollment, provider effects, and production effects remain held.

Still held

• Socrates is qualified as an educational, university, or institutional authority.
• Any source, citation, curriculum, or chronology is verified without an inspectable source record.
• The job is deployed, connected to a provider, backed by an authoritative database, or indexing customers.
• The workflow provides accredited instruction, academic credit, admissions, enrollment, or professional advice.
• Any comparison is complete, correct, exhaustive, or suitable for high-stakes decisions without human review.
• Any documentation route proves a connected web feature or production behavior.
• Any source was browsed, fetched, validated, or published by this proposal.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• agents/index.html#socrates
• source_record:job:socrates:source-comparison
• Observed native contract: Notebook collections, deadlines, records, PointGuard, and held web boundary
• Observed app route: /app/notebook/notes/
• Observed app route: /app/notebook/files/
• Observed app route: /app/notebook/approvals/
• Observed app route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/
• Observed app route: /app/notebook/search/
• Observed app route: /app/notebook/field-guides/