Fleet operations — qualification

Record status

Record ID

job:stan:fleet-operations

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Stan

Owner role

Chief Security and Engineering Officer

Owner status

VERIFIED

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

• Positive: a record with the supplied job ID, Stan ownership, source_ref, one bounded workstream, source locator, current state, deadline, reviewer, and receipt ID is accepted as proposal-only.
• Positive: a fully sourced proposal preserves source locator, source SHA-256 when supplied, canonical record ID, provenance, revision, lifecycle, and linked receipt.
• Positive: a gated request with an approval record in Approved state remains a proposal until a separate authorized execution state is recorded; no external effect is claimed.
• Positive: a blocked request displays the exact blocked reason, principal gate, required approver, next review time, and Held or Needs review state.
• Positive: a chronological workback sorts by dueAt and preserves observed_at and revision order without overwriting earlier receipts.
• Positive: keyboard-only review reaches every field, action, status, and failure message in logical order; focus is visible.
• Positive: every form control has a programmatic label, status is conveyed by text rather than color alone, and errors identify the field and correction.
• Positive: private, sensitive, and held records are excluded from public indexing and shown with their visibility state.
• Negative: the package rejects any claim that Stan has authority not present in the source record, including Antonio’s authority.
• Negative: the package rejects confidence, urgency, or agent ownership as substitutes for permission.
• Negative: destructive remediation, money or purchasing, credential changes, public deployment, and legal filing enter Held or Needs review without the required approval record.
• Negative: it rejects records with missing owner, source reference, authority basis, chronology, or failure state.
• Negative: it rejects a requested provider connection, credential use, database write, customer indexing, publication, or production effect as unverified and held.
• Negative: it rejects duplicate or contradictory revisions unless both revisions remain preserved and the conflict is flagged.
• Negative: it rejects source-free summaries, doorway documentation, keyword-spam content, and unsupported status labels such as deployed, connected, live, qualified, or completed.
• Negative: it rejects inaccessible forms with unlabeled controls, keyboard traps, hidden focus, color-only warnings, or unannounced dynamic status changes.

Negative and held-state tests

• Confusing Stan’s supplied owner status with permission to execute gated effects.
• Manufacturing Antonio’s authority or treating agent confidence as authorization.
• Turning local prototype or indexed routes into evidence of production connectivity.
• Accidentally exposing security, credential, incident, customer, or private continuity data through search or public documentation.
• Overwriting chronology, revisions, or receipts during incident handling.
• Marking blocked or held work complete because a deadline passed.
• Treating source-backed guides as live provider, database, Cloudflare, Supabase, or deployment access.
• Using ambiguous incident labels that imply a real incident without an observed record.
• Creating inaccessible status, approval, or failure-state interfaces.
• Allowing a proposal to be mistaken for qualification, deployment, publication, or operational success.

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

• A proposal exists for Stan’s fleet-operations job.
• The supplied source identifies Stan as the owner agent and Chief Security and Engineering Officer with VERIFIED owner status.
• The supplied source lists Assurance preflight, Terminal courier, Receipt ledger, Source-bound recall, Security field guides, Supabase field guide, Cloudflare operations, and Current-work packets.
• The package defines bounded qualification tests, review states, deadlines, evidence handling, accessibility, privacy, chronology, and failure states.
• The listed Guth routes are prototypes or indexes according to the observed native contract and route records.

Still held

• That Stan has authority beyond the supplied owner and role description.
• That any fleet operation, incident, remediation, deployment, provider connection, credential change, database write, customer index, publication, or production effect occurred.
• That any route is a connected web feature or canonical execution surface.
• That the job is qualified, deployed, live, complete, or approved without corresponding records and receipts.
• That Antonio has authority.
• That confidence, ownership, or a named tool constitutes permission.
• That a provider, database, customer system, or production state exists.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• agents/index.html#stan
• source_record:job:stan:fleet-operations
• job:stan:fleet-operations
• Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections
• Observed native contract: deadlines
• Observed native contract: records
• Observed native contract: pointguard
• /app/notebook/projects/
• /app/notebook/to-dos/
• /app/notebook/approvals/
• /app/notebook/agent-logs/
• /app/notebook/search/
• /app/pointguard/