Page actions
job / candidate
Receipt-backed handoffs — qualification
The distinct qualification record for Receipt-backed handoffs. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- job:stan:receipt-backed-handoffs
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- qualification
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Stan
- Owner role
- Chief Security and Engineering Officer
- Owner status
- VERIFIED
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Qualification status
- Result
- NOT RUN
- Disposition
- HELD
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Receipt
- Not recorded
This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.
Lane-specific instrument aids
Outcome definitions
- Verified
- All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
- Failed
- One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
- Needs review
- Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
- Held
- Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.
The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.
Proposed deterministic acceptance tests
Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.
- A complete packet preserves the supplied source reference agents/index.html#stan and identifies Stan as owner_agent with owner_status VERIFIED, without extending that authority.
- Every material claim has a source locator, source hash or explicit unavailable state, receipt ID, timestamp, and reviewer-visible status.
- Qualification fails when any receipt is missing, duplicated, unverifiable, attached to the wrong canonical ID, or based on a superseded revision.
- Qualification fails when chronology contains impossible timestamps, missing timezone for a decision deadline, broken predecessor links, or unexplained ordering.
- Qualification fails when any proposal treats confidence as permission, manufactures authority, or converts a proposal into an effect.
- Qualification fails when a principal-gate action lacks a separately recorded human approval; the resulting state is Held.
- The interface can be completed using keyboard navigation, exposes labels and status text to assistive technology, does not rely on color alone, and retains visible focus.
- Private evidence is excluded from public-facing records by default; only minimum necessary metadata is shown in shared review views.
- Changing one source byte or supplied checksum causes the hash/checksum test to fail and marks dependent receipts for revalidation.
- Duplicate submission is idempotent by canonical handoff ID and revision; it must not create a second accepted transition.
- Missing source, unavailable tool, provider failure, timeout, malformed payload, permission denial, and conflicting instruction each produce a named failure state with no external effect.
- The final record distinguishes proposed, Needs review, Approved locally, and Held; none claims deployment, provider connection, database authority, customer indexing, publication, or qualification.
Negative and held-state tests
- A receipt can prove that data was recorded, not that the underlying claim is true or that an action was authorized.
- Hash equality can establish content consistency but cannot establish provenance, identity, permission, or safety.
- A named native surface does not prove a connected web feature or external provider effect.
- Timestamp drift, missing timezone, clock changes, and manual backdating can produce false chronology.
- Retries can duplicate handoffs or create conflicting state unless canonical IDs and revisions are enforced.
- Sensitive incident, credential, customer, or infrastructure details may be exposed through notes, attachments, search, or messages.
- Accessibility defects can prevent reviewers from seeing blockers or completing approval.
- A deadline may be mistaken for permission to act.
- Conflicting instructions may be merged incorrectly or resolved without a human decision.
- False positive qualification could permit destructive remediation, credential changes, public deployment, legal filing, or money-related action.
Qualification claim boundary
Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence
- This is a proposal-only qualification package for receipt-backed handoffs.
- The supplied source identifies Stan as the owner agent and Chief Security and Engineering Officer with VERIFIED owner status.
- The package defines review fields, bounded steps, deadlines, negative tests, accessibility checks, privacy checks, chronology checks, and held-effect rules.
- The listed instruments are allowed verified directory entries and are designated for bounded checking purposes.
Still held
- That any handoff is qualified.
- That Stan has authority beyond the supplied source record.
- That any provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, or production feature is connected or active.
- That a receipt proves execution, correctness, authorization, or safety.
- That any external message was sent or any gated action occurred.
- That the native routes are more than local prototypes or indexes.
- That documentation or web behavior has been deployed.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
agents/index.html#stansource_record:job:stan:receipt-backed-handoffsObserved native contract: records preserve canonical IDs, source locators, source SHA-256, provenance, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions.Observed native contract: principal-gated effects remain held and PointGuard does not own specialist canonical records.Observed app routes: /app/notebook/agent-logs/, /app/notebook/approvals/, /app/notebook/messages/, /app/notebook/to-dos/, /app/notebook/search/Allowed instruments: sha-256-hash-function-demoAllowed instruments: checksum-verifierAllowed instruments: date-duration-calculator