Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

job / candidate

Grant research and drafts — forms

The distinct forms record for Grant research and drafts. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
job:tilly:grant-research-and-drafts
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
package
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Tilly
Owner role
Pointguard and independent reviewer
Owner status
WORKING
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Proposed form sections

Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth.

Research brief

Define the grant-search or drafting request and its boundaries.

  • request title
  • requesting agent or person
  • funding area
  • applicant or project name
  • geographic or eligibility scope
  • requested output
  • known deadline
  • source policy
  • sensitive information warning

Grant opportunity

Capture source-backed opportunity details without treating an index as a live funding connection.

  • opportunity name
  • funder name
  • official source locator
  • source access date
  • source SHA-256 if available
  • application URL or locator
  • opening date
  • deadline date and time zone
  • award range
  • eligibility summary
  • required attachments
  • funder contact as quoted
  • status: proposed, researching, qualified, held, closed

Qualification check

Separate explicit requirements from unresolved interpretation.

  • requirement text
  • requirement category
  • evidence citation
  • applicant evidence record
  • meets, does not meet, unclear, or not checked
  • missing evidence
  • contradiction or ambiguity
  • reviewer notes
  • qualification decision
  • decision owner

Evidence and claims

Build traceable receipts for every material assertion.

  • claim text
  • claim type
  • source locator
  • quoted support
  • source date
  • source SHA-256 if available
  • confidence or evidence state
  • contradictory evidence
  • claim examiner disposition
  • public-claim status: held or allowed

Grant draft

Prepare application language that remains tied to reviewed evidence.

  • section name
  • draft text
  • intended audience
  • linked project record
  • linked evidence records
  • word or character limit
  • assumptions
  • open questions
  • revision number
  • draft status

Review and handoff

Record independent review and explicit approval boundaries.

  • reviewer
  • review scope
  • issues found
  • claims exceeding receipts
  • required corrections
  • owner response
  • approval state: needs review, approved, or held
  • final publication decision owner
  • funding commitment decision owner
  • handoff receipt

Accessible state contract

  • Every field requires a visible and programmatic label.
  • Required and optional fields must be stated in text.
  • Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field.
  • Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone.

Supporting documentation fields

These fields come from the docs_urls lane and remain separate from the primary operating form.

Job scope and ownership

Define the research request, accountable owner, reviewer role, and boundaries before work begins.

  • job title
  • requestor
  • owner agent
  • owner role
  • objective
  • scope in
  • scope out
  • status
  • source reference
  • linked project

Grant opportunity intake

Capture the opportunity as a source-bound dossier without implying eligibility, submission, or funding.

  • grant name
  • funder
  • opportunity URL or source locator
  • application deadline
  • time zone
  • eligibility requirements
  • required documents
  • funding amount or range as stated
  • matching or cost-share requirement
  • open questions

Evidence and qualification review

Record receipts, claims, qualification checks, contradictions, and unresolved gaps separately.

  • claim text
  • source locator
  • source SHA-256 when available
  • citation or quotation
  • evidence status
  • qualification criterion
  • qualification result
  • contradiction flag
  • reviewer
  • review notes
  • revision

Draft preparation

Create a controlled draft whose assertions remain traceable to reviewed evidence.

  • draft type
  • intended audience
  • section outline
  • claim IDs
  • required attachments
  • plain-language summary
  • assumptions
  • unsupported language to remove
  • draft status
  • revision

Review and release gates

Prevent self-approval, hidden contradictions, premature public claims, funding commitments, or credential access.

  • independent reviewer
  • review decision
  • approval state
  • publication state
  • funding-commitment state
  • credential-access state
  • change-to-another-agent-source state
  • receipt bundle
  • held reason

Required or proposed record references

No record existence is asserted by this documentation page.

  • source-labelled research notes
  • citation-check receipts
  • grant opportunity record
  • qualification record
  • grant dossier
  • draft application materials
  • claim examination record
  • deadline and workback to-dos
  • review and approval record
  • agent log
  • job record
  • source-labelled notes
  • claim and receipt records
  • qualification records
  • grant dossier records
  • draft records
  • approval records
  • deadline to-dos

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • agents/index.html#tilly
  • source_record:job:tilly:grant-research-and-drafts
  • native contract: records preserve canonical IDs, origin, source locators, source SHA-256, provenance, revision, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions
  • native contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface; specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners
  • native contract: current GuthHub app routes are local prototypes or indexes; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held
  • source record existing tools: Pointguard; Instrument catalog; Claim examiner; Citation checks
  • source record existing guides: Instrument packets; Qualification records; Grant dossiers; Public-claim routes
  • source record principal gates: Final publication; Funding commitments; Credential access; Changes to another agent's source
  • source record never rules: Approve her own evidence; Hide a contradiction; Turn a draft into a public claim
  • job:tilly:grant-research-and-drafts
  • Observed native contract: Notebook records and revisions
  • Observed native contract: PointGuard persistent cross-app context surface
  • Observed app routes: /app/pointguard/, /app/notebook/field-guides/, /app/notebook/approvals/, /app/notebook/paper/, /app/notebook/agent-logs/