Page actions
job / candidate
Grant research and drafts — tools
The distinct tools record for Grant research and drafts. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- job:tilly:grant-research-and-drafts
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- package
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Tilly
- Owner role
- Pointguard and independent reviewer
- Owner status
- WORKING
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Authoritative package lane tools and interfaces
Canonical tools-page assignments
- PointGuard (interface · optional) — Provides contextual work rooms and keeps the current grant-research context visible across specialist surfaces; it is not the canonical record owner.
- Instrument catalog (interface · optional) — Allows inspection of available verified instruments without implying that any instrument is connected to a grant provider or production workflow.
- Claim examiner (skill · required) — Checks whether draft claims outrun their recorded receipts and exposes unsupported or contradictory language.
- Citation checks (skill · required) — Verifies that grant requirements and draft claims point to source-labelled evidence.
- Instrument packets (guide · required) — Provides a bounded structure for documenting instrument inputs, outputs, provenance, and limitations when an instrument is used.
- Qualification records (guide · required) — Structures explicit eligibility checks, unresolved requirements, evidence, and decision ownership.
- Grant dossiers (guide · required) — Structures the assembled opportunity, qualification, evidence, draft, deadline, and review records.
- Public-claim routes (guide · required) — Keeps externally visible claims separate from private drafts and preserves the held state until approval.
- Notebook records (record · required) — Canonical location for source-labelled notes, files, to-dos, revisions, links, and provenance.
- Approvals (record · required) — Canonical local surface for proposal decisions, reviewer receipts, and held actions.
Only the page's admitted lane is rendered as an assignment. Other lane inventories remain source records but are not merged here. Tool kind and required/optional status are preserved.
Authoritative lane instrument assignments
Canonical tools-page assignments
No verified instrument is assigned to this tools lane.
An instrument listed only for another lane does not become a tools-page assignment.
Use boundary
- Grant pages and requirements may change; preserve source revisions and access dates.
- A directory or index may be mistaken for an official funder source; require an official source locator for qualification.
- Eligibility language may be ambiguous; do not convert interpretation into fact.
- Draft impact, capacity, budget, or outcome claims may exceed receipts.
- Conflicting sources may be silently reconciled; preserve both and escalate.
- Deadline time zones and submission channels may be misread.
- Sensitive applicant, credential, or financial information may be placed in an unprotected local record; minimize collection and keep credential access held.
- A draft may be mistaken for a submitted application or public claim.
- Tilly may be pressured to approve her own evidence; enforce independent review.
- Native app routes are prototypes or indexes and do not prove connected web behavior.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
agents/index.html#tillysource_record:job:tilly:grant-research-and-draftsnative contract: records preserve canonical IDs, origin, source locators, source SHA-256, provenance, revision, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisionsnative contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface; specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record ownersnative contract: current GuthHub app routes are local prototypes or indexes; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are heldsource record existing tools: Pointguard; Instrument catalog; Claim examiner; Citation checkssource record existing guides: Instrument packets; Qualification records; Grant dossiers; Public-claim routessource record principal gates: Final publication; Funding commitments; Credential access; Changes to another agent's sourcesource record never rules: Approve her own evidence; Hide a contradiction; Turn a draft into a public claim