Page actions
job / candidate
Website claim review — tools
The distinct tools record for Website claim review. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- job:tilly:website-claim-review
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- package
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Tilly
- Owner role
- Pointguard and independent reviewer
- Owner status
- WORKING
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Authoritative package lane tools and interfaces
Canonical tools-page assignments
- Pointguard (interface · required) — Provides persistent cross-app context for the review while Notebook remains the execution and canonical-record owner.
- Instrument catalog (record · required) — Provides the available instrument records; catalog presence does not establish production connection or authority.
- Claim examiner (skill · required) — Structures comparison of claim wording with receipts and flags wording that outruns evidence.
- Citation checks (skill · required) — Tests whether cited source locators and excerpts are present, relevant, and traceable.
- Instrument packets (guide · required) — Provides bounded instructions for using a verified instrument without expanding its scope.
- Qualification records (record · required) — Preserves the result, assumptions, caveats, and evidence behind a qualification check.
- Grant dossiers (record · optional) — Required only when the reviewed claim is connected to a funding commitment; funding authority remains held.
- Public-claim routes (guide · required) — Defines the review path for claims intended for public presentation while final publication remains held.
Only the page's admitted lane is rendered as an assignment. Other lane inventories remain source records but are not merged here. Tool kind and required/optional status are preserved.
Authoritative lane instrument assignments
Canonical tools-page assignments
No verified instrument is assigned to this tools lane.
An instrument listed only for another lane does not become a tools-page assignment.
Use boundary
- A draft review may be mistaken for publication approval.
- A citation may exist but not support the exact proposition being claimed.
- Incomplete or stale receipts may create false qualification.
- Contradictions may be hidden through selective evidence or softened wording.
- Catalog or route names may be mistaken for connected production capabilities.
- Reviewer independence may be compromised if Tilly approves her own evidence.
- Changing another agent’s source can destroy provenance and exceed authority.
- Sensitive customer, credential, provider, or funding effects may be implied without authorization.
- Accessibility failures can prevent reviewers from inspecting evidence or approval state.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
agents/index.html#tillysource_record:job:tilly:website-claim-review