Citation checks — usage

Record status

Record ID

tool:citation-checks

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

usage

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Tilly

Owner role

Pointguard and independent reviewer

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Workflow use

1. Collect the source materials and associated citations
2. Review evidence independently
3. Reconcile supporting and conflicting evidence
4. Flag contradictions without concealing them
5. Record qualification findings and review provenance
6. Route unresolved issues for decision before publication, funding, credential access, or source changes

Related jobs

• Independent review
• Instrument qualification
• Evidence reconciliation
• Grant research and drafts
• Website claim review

Field guides

• Instrument packets
• Qualification records
• Grant dossiers
• Public-claim routes

Project contexts

• Final publication
• Funding commitments
• Credential access
• Changes to another agent's source

Usage records

• Source citations
• Instrument packets
• Qualification records
• Grant dossiers
• Public-claim routes
• Review provenance

Lane-specific verified instrument aids

No compatible verified instrument is admitted for the usage lane.

Compatibility here means a bounded proposal aid. It does not verify the tool, its implementation, or an external result.

Usage boundary

This usage lane is proposal-only. Implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, publication, provider access, credentials, and authority remain unproven and held.

• The catalog name does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, or authority.
• Evidence may be incomplete, contradictory, outdated, or misapplied.
• Independent review can be undermined if the reviewer approves their own evidence.
• Draft material may be mistaken for a public claim.
• Citation review alone does not establish instrument correctness, operational availability, or authorization.
• High-consequence gates require accountable human or organizational decision-makers.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:citation-checks
• agents/index.html#tilly