Claim examiner — qualification

Record status

Record ID

tool:claim-examiner

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

docs_qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Tilly, Socrates

Owner role

Pointguard and independent reviewer, University guide and tutor entity

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Catalog-observed source metadata

These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.

tool_id

tool:claim-examiner

slug

claim-examiner

title

Claim examiner

owner_agents

Tilly, Socrates

owner_roles

Pointguard and independent reviewer, University guide and tutor entity

related_jobs

Independent review; Instrument qualification; Evidence reconciliation; Grant research and drafts; Website claim review; Guided inquiry; Source comparison; Lesson pathways; Study records; Uncertainty marking

related_field_guides

Instrument packets; Qualification records; Grant dossiers; Public-claim routes; Teaching protocols; Primary-source packets; Course routes; Citation rules

principal_gates

Final publication; Funding commitments; Credential access; Changes to another agent's source; High-stakes instruction; Student identity data; External enrollment; Published curriculum claims

never_rules

Approve her own evidence; Hide a contradiction; Turn a draft into a public claim; Invent a primary source; Hide disputed evidence; Confuse tutoring with authority

lifecycle

candidate

source_refs

agents/index.html#tilly; agents/index.html#socrates

Proposed deterministic qualification tests

• Overview states that the catalog record is observed and that implementation, connection, deployment, qualification, and authority are unproven.
• Input-record route rejects a claim lacking exact claim text, claimant, evidence inventory, or requested decision class.
• Evidence-reconciliation route preserves each supplied source reference exactly and records support, contradiction, absence, and uncertainty as separate fields.
• Contradictions route prevents hiding disputed evidence and requires an unresolved-issue entry before a decision can proceed.
• Independent-review route rejects approval when the reviewer is also the owner of the evidence under review.
• Principal-gates route marks final publication, funding commitments, credential access, changes to another agent's source, high-stakes instruction, student identity data, external enrollment, and published curriculum claims as gated decisions.
• Authority route states that tutoring, review, or evidence reconciliation does not establish institutional, professional, instructional, publication, funding, or credential authority.
• Accessibility test verifies keyboard access, visible focus, logical heading order, descriptive link text, non-color-only status labels, readable contrast, screen-reader labels for evidence fields, and error messages adjacent to invalid fields.
• Privacy test verifies that student identity data and other unnecessary personal data are not requested, retained, or exposed in review records.
• Abuse test verifies refusal or hold behavior for impersonation, fabricated citations, concealed contradictions, unauthorized source changes, credential claims, funding commitments, external enrollment, and high-stakes instructions.
• Source test permits only source references supplied in the source record and rejects invented primary sources or unsupported provider claims.
• Determinism test returns the same qualification result for identical claim, evidence, gate, and reviewer records.
• Deployment test reports unverified rather than claiming that the observed tool is connected, live, or operational.
• Final publication test prevents proposal records from being presented as public claims without a separate authorized publication decision.

Negative and abuse cases

• Invented or altered citations
• Suppressed contradictions or disputed evidence
• Self-approval of evidence
• Draft claims presented as public claims
• Tutoring confused with authority
• Unqualified high-stakes instruction
• Unauthorized changes to another agent's source
• Premature funding, credential, enrollment, or publication decisions
• Exposure of student identity data
• Reviewer impersonation or coercion
• False claims about implementation, connectivity, deployment, or current operation

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after evidence and review

• The catalog record identifies the tool as Claim examiner.
• The supplied record names Tilly and Socrates as owner agents.
• The supplied record associates the tool with independent review, instrument qualification, evidence reconciliation, grant research and drafts, website claim review, guided inquiry, source comparison, lesson pathways, study records, and uncertainty marking.
• The supplied record lists principal gates and never-rules that the proposed documentation must preserve.
• The source record cites agents/index.html#tilly and agents/index.html#socrates.

Still held

• The tool is implemented or connected.
• The tool is deployed, live, or operational.
• The tool has passed instrument qualification.
• The tool or its owners possess institutional, professional, publication, funding, credential, enrollment, or high-stakes authority.
• Any customer use, provider, current metric, effect, or external integration.
• Any primary source beyond the supplied source references.
• Any claim that a draft has become a public claim.
• Any claim that the tool may approve its own evidence or bypass an independent reviewer.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:claim-examiner
• agents/index.html#tilly
• agents/index.html#socrates