Content calendar — qualification

Record status

Record ID

tool:content-calendar

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

docs_qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Rebecca

Owner role

Social media operating agent

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Catalog-observed source metadata

These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.

tool_id

tool:content-calendar

slug

content-calendar

title

Content calendar

owner_agents

Rebecca

owner_roles

Social media operating agent

related_jobs

Social planning; Draft preparation; Asset coordination; Approval routing; Post-performance records

related_field_guides

Brand voice; Channel rules; Campaign packets; Publication receipts

principal_gates

Every public post; Account connections; Paid promotion; Direct-message commitments

never_rules

Self-authorize publication; Invent customer proof; Use an unapproved account

lifecycle

candidate

source_refs

agents/index.html#rebecca

Proposed deterministic qualification tests

• Given a new item with a planning brief, the system creates a draft planning record with an identifier and preserves the supplied source reference.
• Given missing brand voice or channel rules, the item is marked incomplete and cannot enter an approved state.
• Given an unapproved draft, a public-post action is unavailable or deterministically blocked.
• Given an account not explicitly approved for the item, account connection or publication is blocked and an authority exception is recorded.
• Given paid promotion or a direct-message commitment, the item enters a gated state and requires explicit approval before proceeding.
• Given a publication receipt, the system records its provenance and does not infer publication from a draft or plan alone.
• Given absent performance evidence, the system displays unknown or unavailable rather than inventing metrics or customer proof.
• Given duplicate item identifiers or conflicting approval states, the system rejects the update or creates an explicit conflict record.
• Given malformed, oversized, or unsafe asset metadata, the system rejects or quarantines the asset without executing external actions.
• Given a user without the required approval role, the system prevents approval, publication authorization, and account authorization actions.
• Every user-facing state has a text label, programmatic name, deterministic status value, and accessible error message.
• All interactive controls are reachable by keyboard in logical order, expose visible focus, and do not require pointer-only interaction.
• Labels, instructions, errors, and status changes are associated with their controls and announced appropriately to assistive technology.
• Color is not the sole carrier of approval, blocked, missing, or published status; contrast meets the documented accessibility threshold.
• Dynamic updates do not unexpectedly move focus, submit forms, or autoplay motion; reduced-motion preferences are respected.
• The interface remains usable at increased text size and narrow viewport widths without clipped controls or inaccessible overflow.
• Sensitive fields are minimized, not exposed in public documentation routes, and never rendered into URLs or client-visible logs.
• Secrets, access tokens, private account credentials, and unapproved personal data are rejected from ordinary content and asset fields.
• Untrusted text is escaped or safely rendered; links and asset metadata cannot execute scripts or alter approval state.
• Repeated scheduling, publication, or receipt submissions are idempotent and do not create duplicate external commitments.
• The system provides an audit trail for state changes, actor identity, timestamp, and source record without claiming external publication authority.
• Claims about implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, authority, customer proof, and current metrics remain explicitly unproven unless supported by a supplied record.

Negative and abuse cases

• Unapproved public publication
• Use of an unapproved account
• Self-authorized approval or publication
• Unintended paid promotion
• Uncommitted or misleading direct-message promises
• Invented customer proof or performance metrics
• Confusing planned, drafted, approved, and published states
• Exposure of credentials, private account data, or personal information
• Spam, impersonation, harassment, or unsafe campaign content
• Asset provenance or licensing ambiguity
• Accessibility barriers that conceal gates or errors
• Duplicate or replayed publication commitments

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after evidence and review

• The source record identifies Rebecca as owner agent and Social media operating agent as owner role.
• The source record associates the tool with social planning, draft preparation, asset coordination, approval routing, and post-performance records.
• The source record names Brand voice, Channel rules, Campaign packets, and Publication receipts as related field guides.
• The source record identifies principal gates for every public post, account connections, paid promotion, and direct-message commitments.
• The source record prohibits self-authorized publication, invented customer proof, and use of an unapproved account.
• This candidate proposes documentation pages and deterministic qualification tests for the recorded scope.

Still held

• Implementation exists or is connected.
• The tool can publish, connect accounts, run paid promotion, send direct messages, or authorize commitments.
• Rebecca or the tool has authority to approve or publish any particular post.
• Any customer proof, post-performance result, current metric, provider, deployment, or integration exists.
• Accessibility, privacy, security, abuse resistance, source provenance, or qualification has passed.
• The tool is production-ready or independently verified.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:content-calendar
• agents/index.html#rebecca