Draft ledger — qualification

Record status

Record ID

tool:draft-ledger

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

docs_qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Rebecca

Owner role

Social media operating agent

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Catalog-observed source metadata

These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.

tool_id

tool:draft-ledger

slug

draft-ledger

title

Draft ledger

owner_agents

Rebecca

owner_roles

Social media operating agent

related_jobs

Social planning; Draft preparation; Asset coordination; Approval routing; Post-performance records

related_field_guides

Brand voice; Channel rules; Campaign packets; Publication receipts

principal_gates

Every public post; Account connections; Paid promotion; Direct-message commitments

never_rules

Self-authorize publication; Invent customer proof; Use an unapproved account

lifecycle

candidate

source_refs

agents/index.html#rebecca

Proposed deterministic qualification tests

• A draft cannot transition to published or publication-ready without an explicit approval record.
• A draft targeting an unapproved or unknown account is blocked and marked held.
• The system cannot create an approval attributed to the drafting owner without a separate authorized approver record.
• A post containing customer proof is blocked unless its evidence reference and approval status are present.
• Paid-promotion status must be explicitly recorded before paid distribution can be routed.
• Direct-message commitments must be explicitly classified and routed for approval before release.
• An unpublished draft can be retained with a deterministic unpublished reason.
• Publication receipts must include the draft identifier and target account; missing linkage fails qualification.
• Performance records must not alter the original approved draft or receipt.
• Every status transition records actor, timestamp, prior state, new state, and reason.
• Accessibility test: all documentation routes have a unique page title, one logical heading structure, keyboard-accessible controls, visible focus, labels for every input, text alternatives for non-text evidence, and no color-only status meaning.
• Accessibility test: validation and approval errors are programmatically associated with their fields and announced without requiring visual inspection.
• Privacy test: records collect only workflow data necessary for drafting, approval, receipt, and performance tracking; unnecessary personal or sensitive data is rejected.
• Privacy test: access to drafts, approvals, receipts, and performance records is role-restricted and audit logged.
• Abuse test: repeated attempts to publish without approval, use an unapproved account, or create unsupported proof produce a hold and escalation event rather than publication.
• Source test: the displayed owner, role, jobs, field guides, gates, never-rules, and source reference exactly match the supplied source record.
• Authority test: documentation states that the observed catalog entry does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, or authority.
• Authority test: the tool cannot claim it published, connected an account, approved content, or verified customer proof unless an external authorized record supplies that fact.
• Qualification fails closed when required records, source attribution, approval evidence, or authority evidence are missing.

Negative and abuse cases

• Self-authorized publication
• Use of an unapproved account
• Invented or unsupported customer proof
• Unapproved paid promotion
• Unapproved direct-message commitments
• Ambiguous approval ownership
• Missing or altered publication receipts
• Overcollection of personal or campaign data
• Performance records being mistaken for proof of customer outcomes
• False claims about implementation, connection, deployment, qualification, or authority

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after evidence and review

• The source record identifies Rebecca as owner agent.
• The source record identifies Rebecca's role as Social media operating agent.
• The source record lists the related jobs, field guides, principal gates, never-rules, and source reference.
• This proposal defines documentation routes and deterministic qualification tests.
• The proposed ledger may record drafts, approvals, receipts, and post-performance records when those records are supplied by authorized workflow participants.

Still held

• The tool is implemented.
• The tool is connected to any social account.
• The tool can publish or authorize publication.
• The tool has deployment or operational authority.
• The tool independently verifies customer proof.
• The tool has current performance metrics or customer use.
• The tool can approve paid promotion or direct-message commitments without an authorized approval record.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:draft-ledger
• agents/index.html#rebecca