Pointguard — qualification

Record status

Record ID

tool:pointguard

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

docs_qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Tilly

Owner role

Pointguard and independent reviewer

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Catalog-observed source metadata

These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.

tool_id

tool:pointguard

slug

pointguard

title

Pointguard

owner_agents

Tilly

owner_roles

Pointguard and independent reviewer

related_jobs

Independent review; Instrument qualification; Evidence reconciliation; Grant research and drafts; Website claim review

related_field_guides

Instrument packets; Qualification records; Grant dossiers; Public-claim routes

principal_gates

Final publication; Funding commitments; Credential access; Changes to another agent's source

never_rules

Approve her own evidence; Hide a contradiction; Turn a draft into a public claim

lifecycle

candidate

source_refs

agents/index.html#tilly

Proposed deterministic qualification tests

• AT-01 Source fidelity: the record must preserve tool_id pointguard, slug pointguard, title Pointguard, owner agent Tilly, all five related jobs, all four field guides, all four principal gates, both never-rules, and source reference agents/index.html#tilly.
• AT-02 Proposal boundary: every page and export must state that implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, and authority are unproven unless separately evidenced.
• AT-03 Independent review: a reviewer cannot mark a record final when the reviewer is the evidence owner, subject owner, or otherwise has a declared conflict; the record must show an independent reviewer or remain held.
• AT-04 Contradiction visibility: any mutually inconsistent evidence must create a contradiction entry with both references, a description, impact, and unresolved status; omission fails.
• AT-05 Draft/public separation: a draft claim cannot enter a public-claim route unless a qualification decision, source references, reviewer identity, and publication-gate result are present.
• AT-06 Principal-gate lock: final publication, funding commitments, credential access, and changes to another agent's source each require an explicit independent-review decision; missing decisions produce held status.
• AT-07 Accessibility keyboard test: every review, evidence, contradiction, test, and decision control must be reachable and operable by keyboard, have a visible focus indicator, and expose its name, role, value, and validation error to assistive technology.
• AT-08 Accessibility non-visual test: status, failure, held, and contradiction states must not rely on color alone; headings, landmarks, labels, error text, and reading order must remain meaningful without styling.
• AT-09 Privacy test: collect only review data required by the record schema; reject secrets, credentials, unnecessary personal data, and unrelated source content; redact sensitive values in exports and logs.
• AT-10 Abuse test: prevent bulk submission, credential capture, impersonation, evidence deletion, reviewer self-approval, hidden contradictions, and unauthorized edits to another agent's source; rate-limit and audit repeated failures.
• AT-11 Source test: every allowed claim must point to an exact supplied source reference or an attached evidence record; absent provenance means held, not inferred.
• AT-12 Authority test: the system must never represent Pointguard, Tilly, or an independent reviewer as having implementation, deployment, credential authority, funding authority, publication authority, or source-edit authority unless separately proven.
• AT-13 Determinism test: identical normalized inputs, evidence references, and test versions must produce the same status, failure list, and decision rationale.
• AT-14 Instrument-directory test: compatible instruments must use only exact slugs from the supplied allowed directory; unlisted or disposed instruments must be rejected.
• AT-15 Export integrity test: exported records must include revision identifier, record hash or equivalent change marker, source references, test results, held claims, and audit history.

Negative and abuse cases

• Self-approval or conflicted review
• Unsupported conversion of drafts into public claims
• Hidden or discarded contradictions
• False implication that the observed catalog entry proves implementation or authority
• Unauthorized credential access or source modification
• Exposure of submitted secrets or personal data
• Evidence tampering or untraceable revisions
• Accessibility barriers that prevent independent participation
• Abuse through automated submissions, impersonation, or gate bypass
• Using an educational instrument as professional, medical, financial, legal, safety, or engineering authority

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after evidence and review

• The supplied source record identifies a tool named Pointguard with tool_id pointguard and slug pointguard.
• The source record lists Tilly as owner agent and lists Pointguard and independent reviewer as owner roles.
• The source record associates Pointguard with independent review, instrument qualification, evidence reconciliation, grant research and drafts, and website claim review.
• The source record lists Instrument packets, Qualification records, Grant dossiers, and Public-claim routes as related field guides.
• The source record lists final publication, funding commitments, credential access, and changes to another agent's source as principal gates.
• The source record prohibits approving one's own evidence, hiding a contradiction, and turning a draft into a public claim.
• The source record cites agents/index.html#tilly.

Still held

• Pointguard is implemented, connected, deployed, or operational.
• Pointguard has authority beyond the supplied owner, role, job, field-guide, gate, and never-rule statements.
• Pointguard can approve final publication, funding commitments, credential access, or changes to another agent's source.
• Pointguard has access to credentials, private evidence, external systems, or another agent's source.
• Any instrument is qualified merely because it appears in the agent catalog.
• Any grant, customer, deployment, effect, performance metric, provider, or current capability exists.
• Any draft is a public claim.
• Any qualification result is professional, medical, financial, legal, safety, or engineering approval.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:pointguard
• agents/index.html#tilly