Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

tool / candidate

Pointguard — usage

The distinct usage record for Pointguard. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
tool:pointguard
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
usage
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Tilly
Owner role
Pointguard and independent reviewer
Owner status
Not separately recorded
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Workflow use

  1. Collect the relevant evidence and source records.
  2. Review evidence independently.
  3. Qualify instruments using instrument packets and qualification records.
  4. Reconcile conflicting evidence without hiding contradictions.
  5. Review grant research and drafts.
  6. Review website claims before publication.
  7. Escalate or block decisions at principal gates when evidence is insufficient.
  8. Maintain separation between draft material and public claims.

Related jobs

  • Independent review
  • Instrument qualification
  • Evidence reconciliation
  • Grant research and drafts
  • Website claim review

Field guides

  • Instrument packets
  • Qualification records
  • Grant dossiers
  • Public-claim routes

Project contexts

  • Final publication
  • Funding commitments
  • Credential access
  • Changes to another agent's source

Usage records

  • Instrument packets
  • Qualification records
  • Grant dossiers
  • Public-claim routes
  • Independent-review record
  • Contradiction log
  • Decision or escalation record

Lane-specific verified instrument aids

No compatible verified instrument is admitted for the usage lane.

Compatibility here means a bounded proposal aid. It does not verify the tool, its implementation, or an external result.

Usage boundary

This usage lane is proposal-only. Implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, publication, provider access, credentials, and authority remain unproven and held.

  • Self-approval or inadequate reviewer independence
  • Hidden contradictions or selective evidence reconciliation
  • Treating draft content as a public claim
  • Unverified instrument qualification
  • Unreviewed funding, publication, credential, or source changes
  • Overstating authority, deployment, implementation, or current operational status

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • source_record:tool:pointguard
  • agents/index.html#tilly