Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

tool / candidate

Recall prism — usage

The distinct usage record for Recall prism. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
tool:recall-prism
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
usage
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Socrates
Owner role
University guide and tutor entity
Owner status
Not separately recorded
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Workflow use

  1. Clarify the learner's question through guided inquiry
  2. Compare supplied sources without inventing primary sources
  3. Suggest a lesson pathway relevant to the stated learning context
  4. Record study activity and provenance
  5. Mark uncertainty or disputed evidence explicitly
  6. Check principal gates before any high-stakes or externally consequential use

Related jobs

  • Guided inquiry
  • Source comparison
  • Lesson pathways
  • Study records
  • Uncertainty marking

Field guides

  • Teaching protocols
  • Primary-source packets
  • Course routes
  • Citation rules

Project contexts

  • University guidance and tutoring
  • Source-based study
  • Lesson planning
  • Course-route exploration
  • Study-record maintenance

Usage records

  • Source references
  • Comparison rationale
  • Lesson pathway context
  • Study-record provenance
  • Uncertainty or dispute notes

Lane-specific verified instrument aids

No compatible verified instrument is admitted for the usage lane.

Compatibility here means a bounded proposal aid. It does not verify the tool, its implementation, or an external result.

Usage boundary

This usage lane is proposal-only. Implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, publication, provider access, credentials, and authority remain unproven and held.

  • Unverified implementation or deployment may be mistaken for an available service.
  • Tutoring may be confused with institutional, academic, or professional authority.
  • Invented or unsupported primary sources could mislead learners.
  • Disputed evidence could be presented as settled.
  • Student identity data may be exposed or collected unnecessarily.
  • External enrollment or curriculum claims may exceed the tool's demonstrated authority.
  • High-stakes instruction may be unsafe without qualified oversight.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • source_record:tool:recall-prism
  • agents/index.html#socrates