Page actions
tool / candidate
Source lock — qualification
The distinct qualification record for Source lock. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- tool:source-lock
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- docs_qualification
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Wick
- Owner role
- World posts and outreach agent
- Owner status
- Not separately recorded
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Qualification status
- Result
- NOT RUN
- Disposition
- HELD
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Receipt
- Not recorded
This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.
Lane-specific instrument aids
Outcome definitions
- Verified
- All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
- Failed
- One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
- Needs review
- Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
- Held
- Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.
The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.
Catalog-observed source metadata
These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.
- tool_id
- tool:source-lock
- slug
- source-lock
- title
- Source lock
- owner_agents
- Wick
- owner_roles
- World posts and outreach agent
- related_jobs
- World-post research; Outreach dossiers; Message drafts; Response triage; Campaign chronology
- related_field_guides
- World packets; Outreach rules; Account dossiers; Contact histories
- principal_gates
- Every external send; Relationship commitments; Pricing statements; Account access
- never_rules
- Impersonate Antonio; Send from an unverified route; Invent relationship history
- lifecycle
- candidate
- source_refs
- agents/index.html#wick
Proposed deterministic qualification tests
- Source-record fidelity: rendered source record exactly contains tool_id tool:source-lock, slug source-lock, title Source lock, owner agent Wick, owner role World posts and outreach agent, all five related jobs, all four related field guides, all four principal gates, all three never-rules, and agents/index.html#wick.
- Unknown preservation: an artifact with no implementation, connection, deployment, or authority evidence receives unknown for those fields and cannot receive an overall qualified status.
- Identity gate: any artifact proposing impersonation of Antonio fails immediately and records the matching never-rule.
- Route gate: any artifact proposing a send from an unverified route fails immediately; absence of route verification is unknown and blocks sending.
- History gate: any relationship assertion lacking a supplied supporting record is unknown; any assertion contradicting supplied records fails; no history may be inferred from tone or similarity.
- Source gate: every externally material claim must map to a supplied source reference or be marked unsupported; unsupported claims block external send.
- Commitment gate: pricing statements or relationship commitments without explicit review evidence fail or remain unknown and block sending.
- Account-access gate: any account-access request without explicit supplied authority fails; the catalog record alone never grants access.
- Privacy test: collection of recipient credentials, unnecessary sensitive data, or unrestricted contact-history export fails minimization review; redaction must be available before export.
- Abuse test: bulk unsolicited outreach, deceptive identity, evasion of opt-out, harassment, fraud, or pressure tactics fails and produces escalation guidance rather than a draft send.
- Accessibility test: every interactive control is keyboard reachable, has a programmatic name, visible focus, associated error text, and status conveyed without color alone.
- Accessibility structure test: each documentation route has one clear primary heading, logical heading order, descriptive link names, sufficient text alternatives for non-text content, and no instruction dependent only on visual position.
- Determinism test: identical artifact, source set, rule version, and inputs produce byte-equivalent qualification results and remediation codes.
- No-side-effect test: qualification, export, comparison, and remediation routes do not send messages, publish posts, alter chronology, access accounts, or contact recipients.
- Source integrity test: modifying a supplied artifact changes its reported digest or comparison result; the integrity result must not be described as proof of truth or authority.
- Disposition test: any fail or unknown on a principal gate yields blocked; only all required gates passing may yield proposal-qualified, never operationally authorized.
Negative and abuse cases
- Observed catalog presence may be mistaken for implemented or deployed capability.
- Owner-agent labeling may be mistaken for permission to send, publish, access accounts, or make commitments.
- A digest or text comparison may be mistaken for source truth or relationship proof.
- Incomplete records can create false confidence if unknown is collapsed into pass.
- Personal contact histories and recipient data may be over-collected, exposed, or retained unnecessarily.
- Qualification tooling could be repurposed for spam, impersonation, coercion, fraud, or route-evasion.
- Accessibility failures could exclude reviewers or hide blocking statuses.
- Pricing and relationship commitments can create legal, reputational, or commercial exposure.
- A source URL alone does not prove currentness, authorship, permission, or authority.
Qualification claim boundary
Potentially allowed only after evidence and review
- The supplied record identifies tool:source-lock with slug source-lock and title Source lock.
- The supplied record names Wick as owner agent and World posts and outreach agent as owner role.
- The supplied record lists the supplied related jobs, field guides, principal gates, never-rules, and source reference.
- This response proposes documentation routes and deterministic qualification tests.
- The proposal treats implementation, connection, qualification runtime, deployment, and authority as unproven.
- A qualification result can describe evidence status and blocking conditions if the required records and deterministic inputs are present.
- The proposed system must not send, publish, access accounts, impersonate Antonio, invent relationship history, or make commitments without independently supplied authority.
Still held
- The tool is implemented or connected.
- The tool is deployed or operational.
- Wick or any owner role has authority to send external messages or publish world posts.
- The source reference is reachable, current, authoritative, or sufficient by itself.
- Any customer, provider, deployment, usage, metric, effect, or workflow outcome exists.
- The tool can verify identity, source truth, permission, relationship history, pricing, or account access without supplied evidence.
- A qualification result authorizes an external send or relationship commitment.
- Any compatible instrument establishes authority, provenance, or truth.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
source_record:tool:source-lockagents/index.html#wick