Page actions
field guide / candidate
Brand voice — qualification
The distinct qualification record for Brand voice. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- field-guide:brand-voice
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- docs_urls
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Rebecca
- Owner role
- Not separately recorded
- Owner status
- Not separately recorded
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Qualification status
- Result
- NOT RUN
- Disposition
- HELD
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Receipt
- Not recorded
This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.
Lane-specific instrument aids
No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane.
Outcome definitions
- Verified
- All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
- Failed
- One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
- Needs review
- Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
- Held
- Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.
The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.
Proposed deterministic acceptance tests
Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.
- Every guide URL has distinct content: overview defines scope, steps define procedure, forms define fields, examples show bounded records, qualification defines readiness and failure states, and related-jobs maps dependencies.
- The overview labels the guide proposed and states that app routes are prototypes or indexes where applicable.
- A user can identify Rebecca as the source-record owner agent and navigate to the related jobs without a deployment claim.
- The form captures audience, purpose, tone constraints, draft ownership, asset references, approval state, provenance, revisions, and deadlines.
- A draft cannot be represented as sent, published, customer-indexed, or provider-connected by the guide content.
- Approval states are limited to Needs review, Approved, and Held, with a receipt or explanation for each decision.
- Accessibility checks include readable structure, plain-language review, alt-text or equivalent asset notes, and non-color-only status communication.
- A failed evidence check produces a Held outcome with an explicit missing-source reason rather than an invented metric.
- Related records retain canonical IDs, provenance, source locators, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, and attachments where available.
- Search and navigation do not expose private or held records as public documentation.
Negative and held-state tests
- Treating a tone example as an authoritative policy without a source locator or owner review.
- Confusing a locally approved draft with an externally sent or published communication.
- Inventing performance results, audience response, provider delivery, or customer indexing.
- Using duplicate pages with near-identical copy that create doorway content or keyword-spam URLs.
- Attaching assets without recording custody, type, size, provenance, or accessibility notes.
- Allowing Agent work to change canonical records or send messages without human review.
- Missing revision history when multiple draft variants or reviewers are involved.
- Publishing sensitive private notes, held approvals, or internal agent receipts through public documentation.
- Using unsupported medical, financial, legal, or safety claims in brand copy.
Qualification claim boundary
Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence
- This is a proposed field guide for brand-voice preparation and review.
- The source record associates Brand voice with Rebecca and the listed related jobs.
- The guide can describe bounded local drafting, note-taking, approval preparation, deadlines, provenance, and record-linking workflows.
- The guide may link to named prototype or indexed app surfaces as navigation proposals, with their stated lifecycle labels.
Still held
- Deployment or production availability of the guide or any connected workflow.
- Provider, credential, database, customer, publication, or external messaging effects.
- Live social-platform scheduling, delivery, analytics, reach, engagement, or post-performance metrics.
- Qualification of a draft as brand-compliant without human review and recorded evidence.
- Any claim that Rebecca, an Agent, or a specialist app can independently publish, send, approve externally, or modify canonical records.
- Customer indexing, public discoverability, or security guarantees beyond the observed local visibility boundary.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
source_record:field-guide:brand-voiceagents/index.html#rebeccafield-guide:brand-voiceObserved native contract: project_and_field_guide_collectionsObserved native contract: recordsObserved native contract: deadlinesObserved native contract: pointguardApp route: /app/notebook/field-guides/App route: /app/notebook/notes/App route: /app/notebook/approvals/App route: /app/notebook/messages/App route: /app/notebook/files/App route: /app/notebook/to-dos/App route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/App route: /app/notebook/search/